Optimizing treatment selection, and sequencing decisions for Management of HR-Positive, HER2-Negative advanced breast cancer – Proceedings from breast cancer expert group meeting

• Main Authors: Shaheenah Dawood, Maria Konstantionva, Rebecca Dent, Florencia Perazzo, Sung-Bae Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Sandra Franco, Ming-Shen Dai, Sergio Simon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2021-08-01
• Series: BMC Proceedings
• Subjects: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor; Endocrine therapy; Hormone receptor-positive; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative; Metastatic breast cancer PI3K/mTOR inhibitor; Registry
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-021-00224-5

Abstract Purpose The therapeutic landscape of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has evolved considerably with the introduction of newer targeted agents and their combinations with endocrine therapies. In this scenario, optimizing treatment selection and sequencing is daunting for clinicians. The purpose of this review is to provide evidence-based answers to key clinical questions on treatment selection and sequencing for the management of HR + HER2 − mBC. Design A panel of nine key opinion leaders from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Moscow, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and UAE convened in October 2018. They reviewed the literature and formulated answers to clinical questions on optimizing the management of HR + HER2 − mBC. Results Evidence-based answers were formulated for: (1) optimal initial treatment choice; (2) ovarian function suppression, optimal endocrine partner, and role of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (in premenopausal women); (3) better first-line standard of care than aromatase inhibitors; (4) preferred second-line treatment; (5) treatment of oligometastatic disease; (6) factors influencing first-line single-agent endocrine therapy choice; (7) influence of endocrine resistance on treatment selection; (8) optimal maintenance regimen in visceral crisis; and (9) need for a breast cancer registry for patients with HR + HER2 − mBC. The panel also proposed a treatment-sequencing algorithm for the management of HR + HER2 − mBC. Conclusion The current article will serve as a comprehensive guide for optimizing the management of HR + HER2 − mBC. The proposed breast cancer registry will help identify unmet needs and develop strategic regional policies to help improve access to optimized care for HR + HER2 − mBC.