Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen

Stress controlled multiaxial fatigue tests were carried out using hollow cylinder specimens of type 430 and 316 stainless steels at room temperature. A newly developed fatigue testing machine which can apply push-pull loading and inner pressure to the specimen was used. For inner pressure, oil was p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saito Shunsuke, Ogawa Fumio, Itoh Takamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/49/matecconf_icmff1218_09004.pdf
id doaj-04574b12fb994fc0ac1ad08f16a72e04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04574b12fb994fc0ac1ad08f16a72e042021-04-02T13:16:51ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2019-01-013000900410.1051/matecconf/201930009004matecconf_icmff1218_09004Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder SpecimenSaito Shunsuke0Ogawa Fumio1Itoh Takamoto2Graduate School of Science & Engineering, Ritsumeikan UniversityCollege of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan UniversityCollege of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan UniversityStress controlled multiaxial fatigue tests were carried out using hollow cylinder specimens of type 430 and 316 stainless steels at room temperature. A newly developed fatigue testing machine which can apply push-pull loading and inner pressure to the specimen was used. For inner pressure, oil was put inside of the specimen. 7 types of cyclic loading paths were employed by combining axial and hoop stresses; a Pull, an Inner-pressure, a Push-pull, an Equi-biaxial, a Square-shape, a LT-shape and a LC-shape. Fatigue lives vary depending on the loading path when those were evaluated by the maximum Mises’ equivalent stress range on inner surface of the specimen. The fatigue lives of both the steels showed a similar tendency. However, the following difference was identified. Specifically, differences in fatigue lives of type 430 stainless steel between the uniaxial loading and the multiaxial tests were large, while those of type 316 stainless steel were small. To discuss difference in fatigue life properties between both steels, this study investigates the effect of the shear stress range, mean stress and additional hardening and which leads to evaluate the lives suitably.https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/49/matecconf_icmff1218_09004.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saito Shunsuke
Ogawa Fumio
Itoh Takamoto
spellingShingle Saito Shunsuke
Ogawa Fumio
Itoh Takamoto
Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Saito Shunsuke
Ogawa Fumio
Itoh Takamoto
author_sort Saito Shunsuke
title Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
title_short Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
title_full Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
title_fullStr Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
title_full_unstemmed Fatigue Life Properties of Stainless Steels in Wide Ranged Biaxial Stress States using a Hollow Cylinder Specimen
title_sort fatigue life properties of stainless steels in wide ranged biaxial stress states using a hollow cylinder specimen
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Stress controlled multiaxial fatigue tests were carried out using hollow cylinder specimens of type 430 and 316 stainless steels at room temperature. A newly developed fatigue testing machine which can apply push-pull loading and inner pressure to the specimen was used. For inner pressure, oil was put inside of the specimen. 7 types of cyclic loading paths were employed by combining axial and hoop stresses; a Pull, an Inner-pressure, a Push-pull, an Equi-biaxial, a Square-shape, a LT-shape and a LC-shape. Fatigue lives vary depending on the loading path when those were evaluated by the maximum Mises’ equivalent stress range on inner surface of the specimen. The fatigue lives of both the steels showed a similar tendency. However, the following difference was identified. Specifically, differences in fatigue lives of type 430 stainless steel between the uniaxial loading and the multiaxial tests were large, while those of type 316 stainless steel were small. To discuss difference in fatigue life properties between both steels, this study investigates the effect of the shear stress range, mean stress and additional hardening and which leads to evaluate the lives suitably.
url https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/49/matecconf_icmff1218_09004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT saitoshunsuke fatiguelifepropertiesofstainlesssteelsinwiderangedbiaxialstressstatesusingahollowcylinderspecimen
AT ogawafumio fatiguelifepropertiesofstainlesssteelsinwiderangedbiaxialstressstatesusingahollowcylinderspecimen
AT itohtakamoto fatiguelifepropertiesofstainlesssteelsinwiderangedbiaxialstressstatesusingahollowcylinderspecimen
_version_ 1721565541715410944