On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice

Two hindcast (1983–2007) simulations are performed with the global, ocean-sea ice models NEMO-LIM2 and NEMO-LIM3 driven by atmospheric reanalyses and climatologies. The two simulations differ only in their sea ice component, while all other elements of experimental design (resolution, initial condit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Massonnet, T. Fichefet, H. Goosse, M. Vancoppenolle, P. Mathiot, C. König Beatty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-09-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/5/687/2011/tc-5-687-2011.pdf
id doaj-0447014e5d1843efb6dc72a774db0908
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0447014e5d1843efb6dc72a774db09082020-11-25T02:45:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242011-09-015368769910.5194/tc-5-687-2011On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea iceF. MassonnetT. FichefetH. GoosseM. VancoppenolleP. MathiotC. König BeattyTwo hindcast (1983–2007) simulations are performed with the global, ocean-sea ice models NEMO-LIM2 and NEMO-LIM3 driven by atmospheric reanalyses and climatologies. The two simulations differ only in their sea ice component, while all other elements of experimental design (resolution, initial conditions, atmospheric forcing) are kept identical. The main differences in the sea ice models lie in the formulation of the subgrid-scale ice thickness distribution, of the thermodynamic processes, of the sea ice salinity and of the sea ice rheology. To assess the differences in model skill over the period of investigation, we develop a set of metrics for both hemispheres, comparing the main sea ice variables (concentration, thickness and drift) to available observations and focusing on both mean state and seasonal to interannual variability. Based upon these metrics, we discuss the physical processes potentially responsible for the differences in model skill. In particular, we suggest that (i) a detailed representation of the ice thickness distribution increases the seasonal to interannual variability of ice extent, with spectacular improvement for the simulation of the recent observed summer Arctic sea ice retreats, (ii) the elastic-viscous-plastic rheology enhances the response of ice to wind stress, compared to the classical viscous-plastic approach, (iii) the grid formulation and the air-sea ice drag coefficient affect the simulated ice export through Fram Strait and the ice accumulation along the Canadian Archipelago, and (iv) both models show less skill in the Southern Ocean, probably due to the low quality of the reanalyses in this region and to the absence of important small-scale oceanic processes at the models' resolution (~1°).http://www.the-cryosphere.net/5/687/2011/tc-5-687-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Massonnet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
M. Vancoppenolle
P. Mathiot
C. König Beatty
spellingShingle F. Massonnet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
M. Vancoppenolle
P. Mathiot
C. König Beatty
On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
The Cryosphere
author_facet F. Massonnet
T. Fichefet
H. Goosse
M. Vancoppenolle
P. Mathiot
C. König Beatty
author_sort F. Massonnet
title On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_short On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_full On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_fullStr On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_full_unstemmed On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_sort on the influence of model physics on simulations of arctic and antarctic sea ice
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The Cryosphere
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Two hindcast (1983–2007) simulations are performed with the global, ocean-sea ice models NEMO-LIM2 and NEMO-LIM3 driven by atmospheric reanalyses and climatologies. The two simulations differ only in their sea ice component, while all other elements of experimental design (resolution, initial conditions, atmospheric forcing) are kept identical. The main differences in the sea ice models lie in the formulation of the subgrid-scale ice thickness distribution, of the thermodynamic processes, of the sea ice salinity and of the sea ice rheology. To assess the differences in model skill over the period of investigation, we develop a set of metrics for both hemispheres, comparing the main sea ice variables (concentration, thickness and drift) to available observations and focusing on both mean state and seasonal to interannual variability. Based upon these metrics, we discuss the physical processes potentially responsible for the differences in model skill. In particular, we suggest that (i) a detailed representation of the ice thickness distribution increases the seasonal to interannual variability of ice extent, with spectacular improvement for the simulation of the recent observed summer Arctic sea ice retreats, (ii) the elastic-viscous-plastic rheology enhances the response of ice to wind stress, compared to the classical viscous-plastic approach, (iii) the grid formulation and the air-sea ice drag coefficient affect the simulated ice export through Fram Strait and the ice accumulation along the Canadian Archipelago, and (iv) both models show less skill in the Southern Ocean, probably due to the low quality of the reanalyses in this region and to the absence of important small-scale oceanic processes at the models' resolution (~1°).
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/5/687/2011/tc-5-687-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fmassonnet ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
AT tfichefet ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
AT hgoosse ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
AT mvancoppenolle ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
AT pmathiot ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
AT ckonigbeatty ontheinfluenceofmodelphysicsonsimulationsofarcticandantarcticseaice
_version_ 1724761371798667264