Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments
Objective: The aim of this study was to measure occupational exposure doses of technologists who dispense and inject radiopharmaceuticals in 7 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) departments. This was done with the goal to help improving protective designs in PET departments an...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Dose-Response |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820938288 |
id |
doaj-04258bd4f5b44be493e9c9991f7651c2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-04258bd4f5b44be493e9c9991f7651c22020-11-25T02:42:13ZengSAGE PublishingDose-Response1559-32582020-07-011810.1177/1559325820938288Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT DepartmentsWeiguo Li0Lianying Fang1Jieqing Li2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, ChinaObjective: The aim of this study was to measure occupational exposure doses of technologists who dispense and inject radiopharmaceuticals in 7 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) departments. This was done with the goal to help improving protective designs in PET departments and/or establishing national protection standards. Method: Common LiF thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on the chest and necklace of the technologists to monitor whole-body and thyroid doses, respectively. Ring TLDs were also worn on both index fingers to measure individual hand doses. All TLDs were assembled and measured once every 3 months for a total of 12 months. Additionally, we measured and compared the dose of TLDs attached to both the inside and the outside of the technologist’s lead coat. Results: Technologists received relatively high exposures, which accounted for 64% to 94% of the collective dose in their respective departments. Their thyroid doses ranged from 1.2 to 1.7 mSv/a; some technologists’ hand doses exceeded 500 mSv/a. Use of a lead coat reduced the average dose by 8%. Conclusion: Technologists working in PET/CT departments were the main population exposed to radiation. This work underscores the need for enhanced protective measures for these workers to better reduce their exposure, particularly for their hands.https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820938288 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Weiguo Li Lianying Fang Jieqing Li |
spellingShingle |
Weiguo Li Lianying Fang Jieqing Li Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments Dose-Response |
author_facet |
Weiguo Li Lianying Fang Jieqing Li |
author_sort |
Weiguo Li |
title |
Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments |
title_short |
Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments |
title_full |
Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments |
title_fullStr |
Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exposure Doses to Technologists Working in 7 PET/CT Departments |
title_sort |
exposure doses to technologists working in 7 pet/ct departments |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Dose-Response |
issn |
1559-3258 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to measure occupational exposure doses of technologists who dispense and inject radiopharmaceuticals in 7 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) departments. This was done with the goal to help improving protective designs in PET departments and/or establishing national protection standards. Method: Common LiF thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) were placed on the chest and necklace of the technologists to monitor whole-body and thyroid doses, respectively. Ring TLDs were also worn on both index fingers to measure individual hand doses. All TLDs were assembled and measured once every 3 months for a total of 12 months. Additionally, we measured and compared the dose of TLDs attached to both the inside and the outside of the technologist’s lead coat. Results: Technologists received relatively high exposures, which accounted for 64% to 94% of the collective dose in their respective departments. Their thyroid doses ranged from 1.2 to 1.7 mSv/a; some technologists’ hand doses exceeded 500 mSv/a. Use of a lead coat reduced the average dose by 8%. Conclusion: Technologists working in PET/CT departments were the main population exposed to radiation. This work underscores the need for enhanced protective measures for these workers to better reduce their exposure, particularly for their hands. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1559325820938288 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weiguoli exposuredosestotechnologistsworkingin7petctdepartments AT lianyingfang exposuredosestotechnologistsworkingin7petctdepartments AT jieqingli exposuredosestotechnologistsworkingin7petctdepartments |
_version_ |
1724774470056411136 |