Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.

Malaria presents a diagnostic challenge in areas where both Plasmodium falciparum and P.vivax are co-endemic. Bivalent Rapid Diagnostic tests (RDTs) showed promise as diagnostic tools for P.falciparum and P.vivax. To assist national malaria control programme in the selection of RDTs, commercially av...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neeru Singh, Praveen K Bharti, Mrigendra P Singh, Sweta Mishra, Man M Shukla, Ravendra K Sharma, Rajesh K Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589473?pdf=render
id doaj-042368d396e14597b8bc6fea87e3fa48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-042368d396e14597b8bc6fea87e3fa482020-11-25T01:42:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0183e5808010.1371/journal.pone.0058080Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.Neeru SinghPraveen K BhartiMrigendra P SinghSweta MishraMan M ShuklaRavendra K SharmaRajesh K SinghMalaria presents a diagnostic challenge in areas where both Plasmodium falciparum and P.vivax are co-endemic. Bivalent Rapid Diagnostic tests (RDTs) showed promise as diagnostic tools for P.falciparum and P.vivax. To assist national malaria control programme in the selection of RDTs, commercially available seven malaria RDTs were evaluated in terms of their performance with special reference to heat stability.This study was undertaken in four forested districts of central India (July, 2011- March, 2012). All RDTs were tested simultaneously in field along with microscopy as gold standard. These RDTs were stored in their original packing at 25°C before transport to the field or they were stored at 35°C and 45°C upto 100 days for testing the performance of RDTs at high temperature. In all 2841 patients with fever were screened for malaria of which 26% were positive for P.falciparum, and 17% for P.vivax. The highest sensitivity of any RDT for P.falciparum was 98% (95% CI; 95.9-98.8) and lowest sensitivity was 76% (95% CI; 71.7-79.6). For P.vivax highest and lowest sensitivity for any RDT was 80% (95% CI; 94.9 - 83.9) and 20% (95% CI; 15.6-24.5) respectively. Heat stability experiments showed that most RDTs for P.falciparum showed high sensitivity at 45°C upto 90 days. While for P.vivax only two RDTs maintained good sensitivity upto day 90 when compared with RDTs kept at room temperature. Agreement between observers was excellent for positive and negative readings for both P.falciparum and P.vivax (Kappa >0.6-0.9).This is first field evaluation of RDTs regarding their temperature stability. Although RDTs are useful as diagnostic tool for P.falciparum and P.vivax even at high temperature, the quality of RDTs should be regulated and monitored more closely.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589473?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neeru Singh
Praveen K Bharti
Mrigendra P Singh
Sweta Mishra
Man M Shukla
Ravendra K Sharma
Rajesh K Singh
spellingShingle Neeru Singh
Praveen K Bharti
Mrigendra P Singh
Sweta Mishra
Man M Shukla
Ravendra K Sharma
Rajesh K Singh
Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Neeru Singh
Praveen K Bharti
Mrigendra P Singh
Sweta Mishra
Man M Shukla
Ravendra K Sharma
Rajesh K Singh
author_sort Neeru Singh
title Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
title_short Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
title_full Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in Central India.
title_sort comparative evaluation of bivalent malaria rapid diagnostic tests versus traditional methods in field with special reference to heat stability testing in central india.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Malaria presents a diagnostic challenge in areas where both Plasmodium falciparum and P.vivax are co-endemic. Bivalent Rapid Diagnostic tests (RDTs) showed promise as diagnostic tools for P.falciparum and P.vivax. To assist national malaria control programme in the selection of RDTs, commercially available seven malaria RDTs were evaluated in terms of their performance with special reference to heat stability.This study was undertaken in four forested districts of central India (July, 2011- March, 2012). All RDTs were tested simultaneously in field along with microscopy as gold standard. These RDTs were stored in their original packing at 25°C before transport to the field or they were stored at 35°C and 45°C upto 100 days for testing the performance of RDTs at high temperature. In all 2841 patients with fever were screened for malaria of which 26% were positive for P.falciparum, and 17% for P.vivax. The highest sensitivity of any RDT for P.falciparum was 98% (95% CI; 95.9-98.8) and lowest sensitivity was 76% (95% CI; 71.7-79.6). For P.vivax highest and lowest sensitivity for any RDT was 80% (95% CI; 94.9 - 83.9) and 20% (95% CI; 15.6-24.5) respectively. Heat stability experiments showed that most RDTs for P.falciparum showed high sensitivity at 45°C upto 90 days. While for P.vivax only two RDTs maintained good sensitivity upto day 90 when compared with RDTs kept at room temperature. Agreement between observers was excellent for positive and negative readings for both P.falciparum and P.vivax (Kappa >0.6-0.9).This is first field evaluation of RDTs regarding their temperature stability. Although RDTs are useful as diagnostic tool for P.falciparum and P.vivax even at high temperature, the quality of RDTs should be regulated and monitored more closely.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589473?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT neerusingh comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT praveenkbharti comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT mrigendrapsingh comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT swetamishra comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT manmshukla comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT ravendraksharma comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
AT rajeshksingh comparativeevaluationofbivalentmalariarapiddiagnostictestsversustraditionalmethodsinfieldwithspecialreferencetoheatstabilitytestingincentralindia
_version_ 1725035593759457280