A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste

Electronic waste recycling presents workers and communities with a potential for exposures to dangerous chemicals, including metals. This review examines studies that report on blood, hair, and urine biomarkers of communities and workers exposed to metals from e-waste. Our results from the evaluatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aubrey L. Arain, Richard L. Neitzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1802
id doaj-041901f0ecc646d49f190a09dddd5a9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-041901f0ecc646d49f190a09dddd5a9e2020-11-25T00:50:36ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012019-05-011610180210.3390/ijerph16101802ijerph16101802A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-WasteAubrey L. Arain0Richard L. Neitzel1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USADepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAElectronic waste recycling presents workers and communities with a potential for exposures to dangerous chemicals, including metals. This review examines studies that report on blood, hair, and urine biomarkers of communities and workers exposed to metals from e-waste. Our results from the evaluation of 19 publications found that there are consistently elevated levels of lead found in occupationally and non-occupationally exposed populations, in both the formal and the informal e-waste recycling sectors. Various other metals were found to be elevated in different exposure groups assessed using various types of biomarkers, but with less consistency than found in lead. Antimony and cadmium generally showed higher concentrations in exposed groups compared to reference group(s). Mercury and arsenic did not show a trend among exposure groups due to the dietary and environmental considerations. Observed variations in trends amongst exposure groups within studies using multiple biomarkers highlights the need to carefully select appropriate biomarkers. Our study concludes that there is a need for more rigorous research that moves past cross-sectional study designs, involves more thoughtful and methodical selection of biomarkers, and a systematic reporting standard for exposure studies to ensure that results can be compared across studies.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1802metalse-wastebiomarker
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aubrey L. Arain
Richard L. Neitzel
spellingShingle Aubrey L. Arain
Richard L. Neitzel
A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
metals
e-waste
biomarker
author_facet Aubrey L. Arain
Richard L. Neitzel
author_sort Aubrey L. Arain
title A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
title_short A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
title_full A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
title_fullStr A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Biomarkers Used for Assessing Human Exposure to Metals from E-Waste
title_sort review of biomarkers used for assessing human exposure to metals from e-waste
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Electronic waste recycling presents workers and communities with a potential for exposures to dangerous chemicals, including metals. This review examines studies that report on blood, hair, and urine biomarkers of communities and workers exposed to metals from e-waste. Our results from the evaluation of 19 publications found that there are consistently elevated levels of lead found in occupationally and non-occupationally exposed populations, in both the formal and the informal e-waste recycling sectors. Various other metals were found to be elevated in different exposure groups assessed using various types of biomarkers, but with less consistency than found in lead. Antimony and cadmium generally showed higher concentrations in exposed groups compared to reference group(s). Mercury and arsenic did not show a trend among exposure groups due to the dietary and environmental considerations. Observed variations in trends amongst exposure groups within studies using multiple biomarkers highlights the need to carefully select appropriate biomarkers. Our study concludes that there is a need for more rigorous research that moves past cross-sectional study designs, involves more thoughtful and methodical selection of biomarkers, and a systematic reporting standard for exposure studies to ensure that results can be compared across studies.
topic metals
e-waste
biomarker
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1802
work_keys_str_mv AT aubreylarain areviewofbiomarkersusedforassessinghumanexposuretometalsfromewaste
AT richardlneitzel areviewofbiomarkersusedforassessinghumanexposuretometalsfromewaste
AT aubreylarain reviewofbiomarkersusedforassessinghumanexposuretometalsfromewaste
AT richardlneitzel reviewofbiomarkersusedforassessinghumanexposuretometalsfromewaste
_version_ 1725247663196078080