Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases

Vineyard experiments were conducted over five years in the Bordeaux area to evaluate the effectiveness of trunk injections in controlling Eutypa dieback (4 trials) and esca (1 trial). Single treatments were applied in winter 2001 or 2002 using the tree injector StemJect®. Three compounds were tested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Darrieutort, P. Lecomte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2007-04-01
Series:Phytopathologia Mediterranea
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5202
id doaj-041327b969ba4d4cb5bd4ea611d9df80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-041327b969ba4d4cb5bd4ea611d9df802020-11-25T03:51:02ZengFirenze University PressPhytopathologia Mediterranea0031-94651593-20952007-04-0146110.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-18531849Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood DiseasesG. DarrieutortP. LecomteVineyard experiments were conducted over five years in the Bordeaux area to evaluate the effectiveness of trunk injections in controlling Eutypa dieback (4 trials) and esca (1 trial). Single treatments were applied in winter 2001 or 2002 using the tree injector StemJect®. Three compounds were tested: two triazole-derived fungicides, propiconazole and difenoconazole, and one elicitor, 2-hydroxybenzoïc acid. Symptomatic vines of two susceptible cultivars, Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc, had first been identified in summer in the year before the treatments were started. A disease scale was used to rate the severity of the foliar symptoms. After treatment, disease development was recorded on the same vines in the following years, from 2002 to 2005. Analyses were based on the evolution of foliar symptoms and on the development of wood symptoms (% area of dead wood). This novel procedure made it possible to determine the sanitary status of each vine in terms of three classes of disease severity: remission of symptoms, stability or worsening. No treatment had a significantly durable effect on disease expression irrespective of the site, the compound or the disease studied. Some phytotoxic effects with the triazole fungicides were noticed. Prospects for trunk injections as a means to solve these insidious problems in viticulture are discussed.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5202
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Darrieutort
P. Lecomte
spellingShingle G. Darrieutort
P. Lecomte
Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
Phytopathologia Mediterranea
author_facet G. Darrieutort
P. Lecomte
author_sort G. Darrieutort
title Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
title_short Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
title_full Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Trunk Injection Technique to Control Grapevine Wood Diseases
title_sort evaluation of a trunk injection technique to control grapevine wood diseases
publisher Firenze University Press
series Phytopathologia Mediterranea
issn 0031-9465
1593-2095
publishDate 2007-04-01
description Vineyard experiments were conducted over five years in the Bordeaux area to evaluate the effectiveness of trunk injections in controlling Eutypa dieback (4 trials) and esca (1 trial). Single treatments were applied in winter 2001 or 2002 using the tree injector StemJect®. Three compounds were tested: two triazole-derived fungicides, propiconazole and difenoconazole, and one elicitor, 2-hydroxybenzoïc acid. Symptomatic vines of two susceptible cultivars, Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc, had first been identified in summer in the year before the treatments were started. A disease scale was used to rate the severity of the foliar symptoms. After treatment, disease development was recorded on the same vines in the following years, from 2002 to 2005. Analyses were based on the evolution of foliar symptoms and on the development of wood symptoms (% area of dead wood). This novel procedure made it possible to determine the sanitary status of each vine in terms of three classes of disease severity: remission of symptoms, stability or worsening. No treatment had a significantly durable effect on disease expression irrespective of the site, the compound or the disease studied. Some phytotoxic effects with the triazole fungicides were noticed. Prospects for trunk injections as a means to solve these insidious problems in viticulture are discussed.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5202
work_keys_str_mv AT gdarrieutort evaluationofatrunkinjectiontechniquetocontrolgrapevinewooddiseases
AT plecomte evaluationofatrunkinjectiontechniquetocontrolgrapevinewooddiseases
_version_ 1724489126198116352