Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This study examines the perspectives of a range of key hospital staff on the use, importance, scientific background, availability of data, feasibility of data collection, cost benefit aspects and availability of professional personnel for measurement of quality indicators among I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asgar Aghaei Hashjin, Hamid Ravaghi, Dionne S Kringos, Uzor C Ogbu, Claudia Fischer, Saeid Reza Azami, Niek S Klazinga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3900447?pdf=render
id doaj-0410828b30514fdb9b128469a460aeb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0410828b30514fdb9b128469a460aeb22020-11-25T01:32:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8601410.1371/journal.pone.0086014Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.Asgar Aghaei HashjinHamid RavaghiDionne S KringosUzor C OgbuClaudia FischerSaeid Reza AzamiNiek S KlazingaRESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This study examines the perspectives of a range of key hospital staff on the use, importance, scientific background, availability of data, feasibility of data collection, cost benefit aspects and availability of professional personnel for measurement of quality indicators among Iranian hospitals. The study aims to facilitate the use of quality indicators to improve quality of care in hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted over the period 2009 to 2010. Staff at Iranian hospitals completed a self-administered questionnaire eliciting their views on organizational, clinical process, and outcome (clinical effectiveness, patient safety and patient centeredness) indicators. POPULATION STUDIED: 93 hospital frontline staff including hospital/nursing managers, medical doctors, nurses, and quality improvement/medical records officers in 48 general and specialized hospitals in Iran. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: On average, only 69% of respondents reported using quality indicators in practice at their affiliated hospitals. Respondents varied significantly in their reported use of organizational, clinical process and outcome quality indicators. Overall, clinical process and effectiveness indicators were reported to be least used. The reported use of indicators corresponded with their perceived level of importance. Quality indicators were reported to be used among clinical staff significantly more than among managerial staff. In total, 74% of the respondents reported to use obligatory indicators, while this was 68% for voluntary indicators (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a general awareness of the importance and usability of quality indicators among hospital staff in Iran, but their use is currently mostly directed towards external accountability purposes. To increase the formative use of quality indicators, creation of a common culture and feeling of shared ownership, alongside an increased uptake of clinical process and effectiveness indicators is needed to support internal quality improvement processes at hospital level.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3900447?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asgar Aghaei Hashjin
Hamid Ravaghi
Dionne S Kringos
Uzor C Ogbu
Claudia Fischer
Saeid Reza Azami
Niek S Klazinga
spellingShingle Asgar Aghaei Hashjin
Hamid Ravaghi
Dionne S Kringos
Uzor C Ogbu
Claudia Fischer
Saeid Reza Azami
Niek S Klazinga
Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Asgar Aghaei Hashjin
Hamid Ravaghi
Dionne S Kringos
Uzor C Ogbu
Claudia Fischer
Saeid Reza Azami
Niek S Klazinga
author_sort Asgar Aghaei Hashjin
title Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
title_short Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
title_full Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
title_fullStr Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
title_full_unstemmed Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
title_sort using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This study examines the perspectives of a range of key hospital staff on the use, importance, scientific background, availability of data, feasibility of data collection, cost benefit aspects and availability of professional personnel for measurement of quality indicators among Iranian hospitals. The study aims to facilitate the use of quality indicators to improve quality of care in hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted over the period 2009 to 2010. Staff at Iranian hospitals completed a self-administered questionnaire eliciting their views on organizational, clinical process, and outcome (clinical effectiveness, patient safety and patient centeredness) indicators. POPULATION STUDIED: 93 hospital frontline staff including hospital/nursing managers, medical doctors, nurses, and quality improvement/medical records officers in 48 general and specialized hospitals in Iran. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: On average, only 69% of respondents reported using quality indicators in practice at their affiliated hospitals. Respondents varied significantly in their reported use of organizational, clinical process and outcome quality indicators. Overall, clinical process and effectiveness indicators were reported to be least used. The reported use of indicators corresponded with their perceived level of importance. Quality indicators were reported to be used among clinical staff significantly more than among managerial staff. In total, 74% of the respondents reported to use obligatory indicators, while this was 68% for voluntary indicators (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a general awareness of the importance and usability of quality indicators among hospital staff in Iran, but their use is currently mostly directed towards external accountability purposes. To increase the formative use of quality indicators, creation of a common culture and feeling of shared ownership, alongside an increased uptake of clinical process and effectiveness indicators is needed to support internal quality improvement processes at hospital level.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3900447?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT asgaraghaeihashjin usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT hamidravaghi usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT dionneskringos usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT uzorcogbu usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT claudiafischer usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT saeidrezaazami usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
AT nieksklazinga usingqualitymeasuresforqualityimprovementtheperspectiveofhospitalstaff
_version_ 1725083059663929344