Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture

An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaap Munneke, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort, David Sutterer, Jan Theeuwes, Edward Awh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-02-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478
id doaj-040b1a42569b40528f27b9784a12a2b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-040b1a42569b40528f27b9784a12a2b52020-11-27T04:18:38ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-02-01226117562Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional captureJaap Munneke0Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort1David Sutterer2Jan Theeuwes3Edward Awh4College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH Uxbridge, UK; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Brunel University London, UK; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH Uxbridge, UK.Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, USADepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, USA; Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, USAAn extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478Contingent captureAttentional captureEEGMultivariate EEG analysesForward encoding modelsBackward decoding models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaap Munneke
Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
David Sutterer
Jan Theeuwes
Edward Awh
spellingShingle Jaap Munneke
Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
David Sutterer
Jan Theeuwes
Edward Awh
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
NeuroImage
Contingent capture
Attentional capture
EEG
Multivariate EEG analyses
Forward encoding models
Backward decoding models
author_facet Jaap Munneke
Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
David Sutterer
Jan Theeuwes
Edward Awh
author_sort Jaap Munneke
title Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
title_short Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
title_full Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
title_fullStr Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
title_sort multivariate analysis of eeg activity indexes contingent attentional capture
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2021-02-01
description An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention.
topic Contingent capture
Attentional capture
EEG
Multivariate EEG analyses
Forward encoding models
Backward decoding models
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478
work_keys_str_mv AT jaapmunneke multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture
AT johannesjacobusfahrenfort multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture
AT davidsutterer multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture
AT jantheeuwes multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture
AT edwardawh multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture
_version_ 1724414206369857536