Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture
An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on wh...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-02-01
|
Series: | NeuroImage |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478 |
id |
doaj-040b1a42569b40528f27b9784a12a2b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-040b1a42569b40528f27b9784a12a2b52020-11-27T04:18:38ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-02-01226117562Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional captureJaap Munneke0Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort1David Sutterer2Jan Theeuwes3Edward Awh4College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH Uxbridge, UK; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Brunel University London, UK; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH Uxbridge, UK.Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, USADepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, USA; Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, USAAn extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478Contingent captureAttentional captureEEGMultivariate EEG analysesForward encoding modelsBackward decoding models |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jaap Munneke Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort David Sutterer Jan Theeuwes Edward Awh |
spellingShingle |
Jaap Munneke Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort David Sutterer Jan Theeuwes Edward Awh Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture NeuroImage Contingent capture Attentional capture EEG Multivariate EEG analyses Forward encoding models Backward decoding models |
author_facet |
Jaap Munneke Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort David Sutterer Jan Theeuwes Edward Awh |
author_sort |
Jaap Munneke |
title |
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_short |
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_full |
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_fullStr |
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
title_sort |
multivariate analysis of eeg activity indexes contingent attentional capture |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
NeuroImage |
issn |
1095-9572 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
An extensive body of work has shown that attentional capture is contingent on the goals of the observer: Capture is strongly reduced or even eliminated when an irrelevant singleton stimulus does not match the target-defining properties (Folk et al., 1992). There has been a long-standing debate on whether attentional capture can be explained by goal-driven and/or stimulus-driven accounts. Here, we shed further light on this matter by using EEG activity (raw EEG and alpha power) to provide a time-resolved index of attentional orienting towards salient stimuli that either matched or did not match target-defining properties. A search display containing the target stimulus was preceded by a spatially uninformative singleton cue that either matched the color of the upcoming target (contingent cues), or that appeared in an irrelevant color (non-contingent cues). Multivariate analysis of raw EEG and alpha power revealed preferential tuning to the location of both contingent and non-contingent cues, with a stronger bias towards contingent than non-contingent cues. The time course of these effects, however, depended on the neural signal. Raw EEG data revealed attentional orienting towards the contingent cue early on in the trial (>156 ms), while alpha power revealed sustained spatial selection in the cued locations at a later moment in the trial (>250 ms). Moreover, while raw EEG showed stronger capture by contingent cues during this early time window, an advantage for contingent cues arose during a later time window in alpha band activity. Thus, our findings suggest that raw EEG activity and alpha-band power tap into distinct neural processes that index separate aspects of covert spatial attention. |
topic |
Contingent capture Attentional capture EEG Multivariate EEG analyses Forward encoding models Backward decoding models |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920310478 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jaapmunneke multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT johannesjacobusfahrenfort multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT davidsutterer multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT jantheeuwes multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture AT edwardawh multivariateanalysisofeegactivityindexescontingentattentionalcapture |
_version_ |
1724414206369857536 |