Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate

This paper compares the results of the well-known Spalart-Allmares (SA) model and the two-fluid model for the flow around a heated flat plate. These models represent different approaches to the problem of turbulence. The SA model is a one-parameter model and a representative of the RANS models. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malikov Zafar, Navruzov Dilshod, Djumayev Xikmatulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/40/e3sconf_conmechydro2021_01008.pdf
id doaj-040a214c4ace47d8bfb7dcc0f3d3eb92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-040a214c4ace47d8bfb7dcc0f3d3eb922021-06-11T07:17:18ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012640100810.1051/e3sconf/202126401008e3sconf_conmechydro2021_01008Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plateMalikov Zafar0Navruzov Dilshod1Djumayev Xikmatulla2Institute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of StructuresInstitute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of StructuresTashkent State Transport UniversityThis paper compares the results of the well-known Spalart-Allmares (SA) model and the two-fluid model for the flow around a heated flat plate. These models represent different approaches to the problem of turbulence. The SA model is a one-parameter model and a representative of the RANS models. This model is currently the most popular and is used to solve many practical problems. The advantage of this model is that its accuracy is quite good and simple for numerical implementation. Therefore, the SA model is included in almost all the codes of the software package. The two-fluid model used in this work has been developed recently [15]. In the pioneering works, it is shown that the basis for constructing this model is the possibility of representing a turbulent flow in the form of a heterogeneous mixture of two liquids. Therefore, this model is derived from the dynamics of two liquids. In these works, it is also shown that the developed two-fluid model is able to adequately describe complex anisotropic turbulences. The fundamental difference between these two models is that the SA model uses the substance transfer equation, while the two-fluid model uses the dynamics equation. To compare the two models, we compare their numerical results with the known experimental data. It is shown that the results of both models are close to each other and are in good agreement with the experimental data.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/40/e3sconf_conmechydro2021_01008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Malikov Zafar
Navruzov Dilshod
Djumayev Xikmatulla
spellingShingle Malikov Zafar
Navruzov Dilshod
Djumayev Xikmatulla
Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Malikov Zafar
Navruzov Dilshod
Djumayev Xikmatulla
author_sort Malikov Zafar
title Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
title_short Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
title_full Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
title_fullStr Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
title_full_unstemmed Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
title_sort models results comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This paper compares the results of the well-known Spalart-Allmares (SA) model and the two-fluid model for the flow around a heated flat plate. These models represent different approaches to the problem of turbulence. The SA model is a one-parameter model and a representative of the RANS models. This model is currently the most popular and is used to solve many practical problems. The advantage of this model is that its accuracy is quite good and simple for numerical implementation. Therefore, the SA model is included in almost all the codes of the software package. The two-fluid model used in this work has been developed recently [15]. In the pioneering works, it is shown that the basis for constructing this model is the possibility of representing a turbulent flow in the form of a heterogeneous mixture of two liquids. Therefore, this model is derived from the dynamics of two liquids. In these works, it is also shown that the developed two-fluid model is able to adequately describe complex anisotropic turbulences. The fundamental difference between these two models is that the SA model uses the substance transfer equation, while the two-fluid model uses the dynamics equation. To compare the two models, we compare their numerical results with the known experimental data. It is shown that the results of both models are close to each other and are in good agreement with the experimental data.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/40/e3sconf_conmechydro2021_01008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT malikovzafar modelsresultscomparisonofdifferentapproachestoturbulenceforflowpastaheatedflatplate
AT navruzovdilshod modelsresultscomparisonofdifferentapproachestoturbulenceforflowpastaheatedflatplate
AT djumayevxikmatulla modelsresultscomparisonofdifferentapproachestoturbulenceforflowpastaheatedflatplate
_version_ 1721382963439992832