Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms

Spatial claims concerning the rapidly growing European offshore wind sector give rise to various ideas for the multi-use application of wind farms. Seaweed is considered a promising feedstock for food and feed that could be produced at offshore wind farms. Concerns about risks resulting in liability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sander W. K. van den Burg, Christine Röckmann, Jennifer L. Banach, Luc van Hoof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00060/full
id doaj-03e3061d16894810b882d1ca2fc6cb56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03e3061d16894810b882d1ca2fc6cb562020-11-25T02:11:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452020-02-01710.3389/fmars.2020.00060475433Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind FarmsSander W. K. van den Burg0Christine Röckmann1Jennifer L. Banach2Luc van Hoof3Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsWageningen Marine Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsSpatial claims concerning the rapidly growing European offshore wind sector give rise to various ideas for the multi-use application of wind farms. Seaweed is considered a promising feedstock for food and feed that could be produced at offshore wind farms. Concerns about risks resulting in liability claims and insurance premiums are often seen as show-stoppers to multi-use at offshore wind farms. In this study, key environmental risks of seaweed cultivation at offshore wind farms, identified through literature review, are characterized based on stakeholder consultation. The current approach to risk governance is evaluated to assess how it can handle the uncertain, complex, and/or ambiguous risks of multi-use. It is concluded that current risk governance for multi-use is poorly equipped to deal with the systemic nature of risks. Risk governance should be a joint effort of governments and private regulators. It can improve if it is based on an adaptive framework for risk assessment that can deal with complex, systemic risks. Furthermore, it should be flexible and inclusive, i.e., open to new incoming information and stakeholder input, and taking into account and communicate about the different stakes and values of the various parties involved. The importance of communication and inclusion must be recognized, which promotes participation of concerned stakeholders.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00060/fullrisk governancemulti-use at seaseaweedpublic regulationprivate standards
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sander W. K. van den Burg
Christine Röckmann
Jennifer L. Banach
Luc van Hoof
spellingShingle Sander W. K. van den Burg
Christine Röckmann
Jennifer L. Banach
Luc van Hoof
Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
Frontiers in Marine Science
risk governance
multi-use at sea
seaweed
public regulation
private standards
author_facet Sander W. K. van den Burg
Christine Röckmann
Jennifer L. Banach
Luc van Hoof
author_sort Sander W. K. van den Burg
title Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
title_short Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
title_full Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
title_fullStr Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
title_full_unstemmed Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms
title_sort governing risks of multi-use: seaweed aquaculture at offshore wind farms
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Spatial claims concerning the rapidly growing European offshore wind sector give rise to various ideas for the multi-use application of wind farms. Seaweed is considered a promising feedstock for food and feed that could be produced at offshore wind farms. Concerns about risks resulting in liability claims and insurance premiums are often seen as show-stoppers to multi-use at offshore wind farms. In this study, key environmental risks of seaweed cultivation at offshore wind farms, identified through literature review, are characterized based on stakeholder consultation. The current approach to risk governance is evaluated to assess how it can handle the uncertain, complex, and/or ambiguous risks of multi-use. It is concluded that current risk governance for multi-use is poorly equipped to deal with the systemic nature of risks. Risk governance should be a joint effort of governments and private regulators. It can improve if it is based on an adaptive framework for risk assessment that can deal with complex, systemic risks. Furthermore, it should be flexible and inclusive, i.e., open to new incoming information and stakeholder input, and taking into account and communicate about the different stakes and values of the various parties involved. The importance of communication and inclusion must be recognized, which promotes participation of concerned stakeholders.
topic risk governance
multi-use at sea
seaweed
public regulation
private standards
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00060/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sanderwkvandenburg governingrisksofmultiuseseaweedaquacultureatoffshorewindfarms
AT christinerockmann governingrisksofmultiuseseaweedaquacultureatoffshorewindfarms
AT jenniferlbanach governingrisksofmultiuseseaweedaquacultureatoffshorewindfarms
AT lucvanhoof governingrisksofmultiuseseaweedaquacultureatoffshorewindfarms
_version_ 1724913933508149248