Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model

The choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FT...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun Seok Choi, Mun-Ju Shin, Kyung Tak Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/9/1269
id doaj-03e066eea3ba4127b9ca935a81b3c783
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03e066eea3ba4127b9ca935a81b3c7832020-11-24T21:46:47ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412018-09-01109126910.3390/w10091269w10091269Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff ModelYun Seok Choi0Mun-Ju Shin1Kyung Tak Kim2Department of Land, Water and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, KoreaWater Resources Research Team, Jeju Province Development Corporation, 1717-35, Namjo-ro, Jocheon-eup, Jeju-si, Jeju-do 63345, KoreaDepartment of Land, Water and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, KoreaThe choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FTS) method and the automatic time step (ATS) method on the simulated runoff of a distributed rainfall–runoff model were compared. The results revealed that the ATS method had less peak flow variability than the FTS method for the virtual catchment. In the FTS method, the difference in time step had more impact on the runoff simulation results than the other factors such as differences in the amount of rainfall, the density of the stream network, or the spatial resolution of the input data. Different optimal parameter values according to the computational time step were found when FTS and ATS were used in a real catchment, and the changes in the optimal parameter values were smaller in ATS than in FTS. The results of our analyses can help to yield reliable runoff simulation results.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/9/1269computational time stepautomatic time stepfixed time stepdistributed rainfall–runoff modelpeak flow percentage error
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yun Seok Choi
Mun-Ju Shin
Kyung Tak Kim
spellingShingle Yun Seok Choi
Mun-Ju Shin
Kyung Tak Kim
Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
Water
computational time step
automatic time step
fixed time step
distributed rainfall–runoff model
peak flow percentage error
author_facet Yun Seok Choi
Mun-Ju Shin
Kyung Tak Kim
author_sort Yun Seok Choi
title Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
title_short Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
title_full Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
title_fullStr Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Study of Computational Time Steps in a Physically Based Distributed Rainfall–Runoff Model
title_sort preliminary study of computational time steps in a physically based distributed rainfall–runoff model
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The choice of the computational time step (dt) value and the method for setting dt can have a bearing on the accuracy and performance of a simulation, and this effect has not been comprehensively researched across different simulation conditions. In this study, the effects of the fixed time step (FTS) method and the automatic time step (ATS) method on the simulated runoff of a distributed rainfall–runoff model were compared. The results revealed that the ATS method had less peak flow variability than the FTS method for the virtual catchment. In the FTS method, the difference in time step had more impact on the runoff simulation results than the other factors such as differences in the amount of rainfall, the density of the stream network, or the spatial resolution of the input data. Different optimal parameter values according to the computational time step were found when FTS and ATS were used in a real catchment, and the changes in the optimal parameter values were smaller in ATS than in FTS. The results of our analyses can help to yield reliable runoff simulation results.
topic computational time step
automatic time step
fixed time step
distributed rainfall–runoff model
peak flow percentage error
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/9/1269
work_keys_str_mv AT yunseokchoi preliminarystudyofcomputationaltimestepsinaphysicallybaseddistributedrainfallrunoffmodel
AT munjushin preliminarystudyofcomputationaltimestepsinaphysicallybaseddistributedrainfallrunoffmodel
AT kyungtakkim preliminarystudyofcomputationaltimestepsinaphysicallybaseddistributedrainfallrunoffmodel
_version_ 1725900018500501504