The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory

Drawing on the ethico-political relationship between memory and justice in the sense proposed by Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, this article addresses the recovery of the historical memory of the victims of Francisco Franco’s dictatorship (1939–1975). It does so by contrasting Antonio Muñoz Mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mónica López Lerma
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Conserveries Mémorielles 2011-04-01
Series:Conserveries Mémorielles : Revue Transdisciplinaire de Jeunes Chercheurs
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cm/840
id doaj-03c5bbef430a4f849d98d52d68143dbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03c5bbef430a4f849d98d52d68143dbf2020-11-24T21:35:10ZdeuConserveries MémoriellesConserveries Mémorielles : Revue Transdisciplinaire de Jeunes Chercheurs1718-55562011-04-019The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical MemoryMónica López LermaDrawing on the ethico-political relationship between memory and justice in the sense proposed by Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, this article addresses the recovery of the historical memory of the victims of Francisco Franco’s dictatorship (1939–1975). It does so by contrasting Antonio Muñoz Molina’s novel Beltenebros (Prince of Shadows, 1989) and the recent Spanish “Law of Historical Memory” (2007). In juxtaposing the novel and the current law, it aims to trace in each text a series of recurring representational practices (words, images, expressions) that seek to do justice to the victims, with unequal success. The novel’s recurring expressions (i.e., shadows, the repressed, eternal return, ghosts, and blindness) stress the importance of coming to terms with the “ghosts of the past.” The law focuses instead on other words and images (i.e., foundation, reconciliation, concord, and closure) that allude to the idea of historical progress, it will be argued, without proper acknowledgment of the injustices of the past. In doing so, the law becomes a commemorative site for the Spanish Transition, but not for the recovery of the victims’ memory. The law’s re-appropriation of the “spirit of the Transition” reveals Spain’s deep fear of confronting the ghosts of the past, a fear that can be perceived still today.http://journals.openedition.org/cm/840
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mónica López Lerma
spellingShingle Mónica López Lerma
The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
Conserveries Mémorielles : Revue Transdisciplinaire de Jeunes Chercheurs
author_facet Mónica López Lerma
author_sort Mónica López Lerma
title The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
title_short The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
title_full The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
title_fullStr The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
title_full_unstemmed The Ghosts of Justice and the Law of Historical Memory
title_sort ghosts of justice and the law of historical memory
publisher Conserveries Mémorielles
series Conserveries Mémorielles : Revue Transdisciplinaire de Jeunes Chercheurs
issn 1718-5556
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Drawing on the ethico-political relationship between memory and justice in the sense proposed by Walter Benjamin and Jacques Derrida, this article addresses the recovery of the historical memory of the victims of Francisco Franco’s dictatorship (1939–1975). It does so by contrasting Antonio Muñoz Molina’s novel Beltenebros (Prince of Shadows, 1989) and the recent Spanish “Law of Historical Memory” (2007). In juxtaposing the novel and the current law, it aims to trace in each text a series of recurring representational practices (words, images, expressions) that seek to do justice to the victims, with unequal success. The novel’s recurring expressions (i.e., shadows, the repressed, eternal return, ghosts, and blindness) stress the importance of coming to terms with the “ghosts of the past.” The law focuses instead on other words and images (i.e., foundation, reconciliation, concord, and closure) that allude to the idea of historical progress, it will be argued, without proper acknowledgment of the injustices of the past. In doing so, the law becomes a commemorative site for the Spanish Transition, but not for the recovery of the victims’ memory. The law’s re-appropriation of the “spirit of the Transition” reveals Spain’s deep fear of confronting the ghosts of the past, a fear that can be perceived still today.
url http://journals.openedition.org/cm/840
work_keys_str_mv AT monicalopezlerma theghostsofjusticeandthelawofhistoricalmemory
AT monicalopezlerma ghostsofjusticeandthelawofhistoricalmemory
_version_ 1725946321870782464