| Summary: | Dirofilariasis is a helminths vector-borne disease caused by two species of <i>Dirofolaria</i><i>—</i><i>D.repens </i>and<i> D.immitis. </i>The former is overwhelmingly associated with human dirofilariasis<i>.</i> The vector of the worm are mosquitoes of the family <i>Culicidae</i> (largely <i>Culex</i>, <i>Aedes</i> and <i>Anopheles</i>). The definitive hosts of <i>Dirofilaria </i>are dogs and to a lesser extent cats. Humans are an accidental host.<i> </i>A total of 1200 human cases caused by <i>Dirofilaria </i>were registered in the territory of the ex-USSR during the period 1915–2016. Zonal differences have been seen in the prevalence of infected dogs and mosquitoes. Studies undertaken in the southern part of the Russian Federation (RF) revealed the prevalence of <i>Dirofilaria</i> in dogs to be 20.8% with wild variations of larva density. Studies carried out in the central part of the RF found that the prevalence of parasites in dogs was 4.1%. <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes were infected less than <i>Culex</i> and <i>Anopheles</i> mosquitoes. The latter were infected by <i>D. repens</i> more often than <i>Culex</i> and <i>Aedes.</i> Zonal differences were also traced in regard to <i>Dirofilaria</i> prevalence in humans, thus allowing identification of three zones of risk of infection (low, moderate, and stable), reflected in a series of constructed maps.<i> </i>Although<i> </i>Dirofilariasis was known on the territory of Russia from 1915, only sporadic cases of the disease were reported occasionally.<i> </i>Its number was showed an increasing trend only during the 1980s–1990s, reaching the level of hundreds of cases.<i> </i>The majority of cases were confined to the southern parts of Russia with geographic coordinates of 43°–45° on the northern latitude. Comparison of the timing of the global trend of climate warming during the 1990s with the temporal pattern of <i>Dirofilaria </i>on the territory of Russia during the same period demonstrated a close association between two phenomena. With the continuous process of global climate warming, the incidence of dirofilariasis both in man and dogs goes unabated exemplified by the territorial expansion of the disease northwards and eastwards attaining the latitude of 56°–57° on the northern latitude in the European and Asian parts of Russia. It appears that within the period of the last 20–25 years, the population at risk has doubled. Under these circumstances, dirofilariases in Russia should be considered as an emerging public health problem necessitating the establishment of a comprehensive epidemiological monitoring system with strong entomological and veterinary components. Based on the results obtained, an appropriate control intervention could be developed.
|
|---|
