Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1

The purpose of this study was to establish whether there is agreement among academic nurse leaders in their interpretation of aspects and criteria related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses. The Delphi technique was selected as the most appropriate method of data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: H. Brink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 1993-03-01
Series:Curationis
Online Access:https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1407
id doaj-03b4a1d0e14748529aad8eb85f74510b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03b4a1d0e14748529aad8eb85f74510b2020-11-24T20:43:02ZengAOSISCurationis0379-85772223-62791993-03-01163626710.4102/curationis.v16i3.14071170Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1H. BrinkThe purpose of this study was to establish whether there is agreement among academic nurse leaders in their interpretation of aspects and criteria related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses. The Delphi technique was selected as the most appropriate method of data-collection for this type of study. The target population identified for this study consisted of the Heads of Nursing Departments or their delegates from the 18 universities of the four provinces of the RSA, self-governing and independent states of Southern Africa and Namibia, which offer nursing degrees.https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1407
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Brink
spellingShingle H. Brink
Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
Curationis
author_facet H. Brink
author_sort H. Brink
title Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
title_short Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
title_full Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
title_fullStr Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
title_full_unstemmed Academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – Part 1
title_sort academic nurse leaders’ interpretation of concepts and priorities related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses – part 1
publisher AOSIS
series Curationis
issn 0379-8577
2223-6279
publishDate 1993-03-01
description The purpose of this study was to establish whether there is agreement among academic nurse leaders in their interpretation of aspects and criteria related to the examination of scientific short papers, dissertations and theses. The Delphi technique was selected as the most appropriate method of data-collection for this type of study. The target population identified for this study consisted of the Heads of Nursing Departments or their delegates from the 18 universities of the four provinces of the RSA, self-governing and independent states of Southern Africa and Namibia, which offer nursing degrees.
url https://curationis.org.za/index.php/curationis/article/view/1407
work_keys_str_mv AT hbrink academicnurseleadersinterpretationofconceptsandprioritiesrelatedtotheexaminationofscientificshortpapersdissertationsandthesespart1
_version_ 1716820935219085312