Textes et textures numériques

The printed text never suspends the materiality of its medium, that is, it never allows the reader to forget it. The digital text, on the other hand, as soon as it is subtracted from its reading devices, puts this materiality in suspense, so to be often called “virtual”. However, digital texts have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rossana De Angelis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de liège 2018-10-01
Series:Signata
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/signata/1675
id doaj-03842b00c2f14bb6bf39b776a0b6cce4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03842b00c2f14bb6bf39b776a0b6cce42020-11-25T04:03:26ZengUniversité de liègeSignata2032-98062018-10-01945948410.4000/signata.1675Textes et textures numériquesRossana De AngelisThe printed text never suspends the materiality of its medium, that is, it never allows the reader to forget it. The digital text, on the other hand, as soon as it is subtracted from its reading devices, puts this materiality in suspense, so to be often called “virtual”. However, digital texts have a material dimension that leads to new exploration practices that have a major impact on our cultural and cognitive habits because they require a transfer of skills from the culture of printed texts to the culture of digital texts. Indeed, while the concept of literacy identifies the specific competencies required by reading and writing skills for manuscript and/or printed texts, the new concept of digital literacy identifies specific competencies required by the culture of digital texts. And for the most part, these skills are still to be explored. To carry on this reflection, it is therefore essential to take into account “digital materiality” (Doueihi, 2011) in order to understand its impact on new productive and interpretative practices of texts. For example, the ability to exploit texts through automatic data analysis depends strictly on the particular nature of digital materiality: so we can see the impact that materiality can have on any approach to text. Moreover, considering the interaction between the materiality of the medium and the practices of its exploitation, we can observe that digital texts make visible all the intra- and inter-textual links that compose a text, that is to say their own textuality, which allows us to talk of digital textures. Our reflections on the materiality of the media, its transformations and its challenges during the transition from the culture of printed texts to the culture of digital texts, are based on the article by Louis Hjelmslev entitled La stratification du langage (1954). By proposing a stratified model of the text stemming from this reflection, and by applying it to the analysis of traditional and digital texts, we can finally replace the practices concerning the exploitation of texts and the materials by which media are made, inside the semiotic object.http://journals.openedition.org/signata/1675writingtextcarrier (material)practicesdigital
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rossana De Angelis
spellingShingle Rossana De Angelis
Textes et textures numériques
Signata
writing
text
carrier (material)
practices
digital
author_facet Rossana De Angelis
author_sort Rossana De Angelis
title Textes et textures numériques
title_short Textes et textures numériques
title_full Textes et textures numériques
title_fullStr Textes et textures numériques
title_full_unstemmed Textes et textures numériques
title_sort textes et textures numériques
publisher Université de liège
series Signata
issn 2032-9806
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The printed text never suspends the materiality of its medium, that is, it never allows the reader to forget it. The digital text, on the other hand, as soon as it is subtracted from its reading devices, puts this materiality in suspense, so to be often called “virtual”. However, digital texts have a material dimension that leads to new exploration practices that have a major impact on our cultural and cognitive habits because they require a transfer of skills from the culture of printed texts to the culture of digital texts. Indeed, while the concept of literacy identifies the specific competencies required by reading and writing skills for manuscript and/or printed texts, the new concept of digital literacy identifies specific competencies required by the culture of digital texts. And for the most part, these skills are still to be explored. To carry on this reflection, it is therefore essential to take into account “digital materiality” (Doueihi, 2011) in order to understand its impact on new productive and interpretative practices of texts. For example, the ability to exploit texts through automatic data analysis depends strictly on the particular nature of digital materiality: so we can see the impact that materiality can have on any approach to text. Moreover, considering the interaction between the materiality of the medium and the practices of its exploitation, we can observe that digital texts make visible all the intra- and inter-textual links that compose a text, that is to say their own textuality, which allows us to talk of digital textures. Our reflections on the materiality of the media, its transformations and its challenges during the transition from the culture of printed texts to the culture of digital texts, are based on the article by Louis Hjelmslev entitled La stratification du langage (1954). By proposing a stratified model of the text stemming from this reflection, and by applying it to the analysis of traditional and digital texts, we can finally replace the practices concerning the exploitation of texts and the materials by which media are made, inside the semiotic object.
topic writing
text
carrier (material)
practices
digital
url http://journals.openedition.org/signata/1675
work_keys_str_mv AT rossanadeangelis textesettexturesnumeriques
_version_ 1724440050514526208