Alveolar bone plate measurements of maxillary anterior teeth: A retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography study, AlMadianh, Saudi Arabia

Purpose: To study bone profile (facial bone thickness and height of alveolar bone crest) of anterior maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area among Saudi dentulous adults. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Taibah University College of Dentistry and Hospital, AlMadinah; Saudi Arabia. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamsah Sheerah, Badr Othman, Arwa Jaafar, Alla Alsharif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218307247
Description
Summary:Purpose: To study bone profile (facial bone thickness and height of alveolar bone crest) of anterior maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area among Saudi dentulous adults. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Taibah University College of Dentistry and Hospital, AlMadinah; Saudi Arabia. The analysis included 490 adult patients’ Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) retrieved from Kodak Carestream-R4 database. Alveolar bone thicknesses and crest bone-height for maxillary anterior teeth were measured directly on CBCT images using built-in digital caliper. Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis were performed. Results: Of the 490 CBCTs 186 were found useable for the study purpose. The mean age of the patients was 34.65 ± 11.57and 109 (59%) were males. Statistically significant (P < 0.001) differences were found between the mean ± SD facial plate thickness of the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines (1.12 ± 0.28 mm, 1.14 ± 0.31 mm, and 1.03 ± 0.24 mm, respectively). In addition, facial plate height increased statistically significantly positively with age for the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines (r = 0.543, n = 186, p = 0.001; r = 0.515, n = 186, p = 0.001; r = 0.474, n = 186, p = 0.001, respectively). Genderwise, males had statistically significantly (P < 0.00) higher facial bone thickness e.g. in central incisor (males 1.20 ± 0.29 VS females 1.04 ± 0.25, p = 0.001) and increased bone height (Males 2.62 ± 0.77VS females 2.09 ± 0.66, p = 0.001) compared to females. Conclusion: In this study, the significant differences in bone thickness and crest height between anterior maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area was highlighted. Notably, increases in facial plate crest height was linked to age and male and female differed on both facial bone thickness and bone height. Keywords: Alveolar ridge, Computer-assisted image analysis, Maxilla, Teeth
ISSN:1013-9052