Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: The conventional right ventricular (RV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) is the RV apex (RV-A). Little is known about electrophysiological stability and associated complications of pacing leads in RV high posterior septal (RV-HS) position in CRT-P. Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H.M. Kristiansen, MD, T. Hovstad, MD, G. Vollan, MD, S. Faerestrand, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012-01-01
Series:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Subjects:
CRT
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216304582
id doaj-036a065e6ff9490b8e095cb99823d8da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-036a065e6ff9490b8e095cb99823d8da2020-11-24T22:36:35ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922012-01-0112141410.1016/S0972-6292(16)30458-2Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyH.M. Kristiansen, MD0T. Hovstad, MD1G. Vollan, MD2S. Faerestrand, MD, PhD3Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayBackground: The conventional right ventricular (RV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) is the RV apex (RV-A). Little is known about electrophysiological stability and associated complications of pacing leads in RV high posterior septal (RV-HS) position in CRT-P. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-five consecutive CRT-P patients were included from 1999-2010. Pacing thresholds at 0.5 ms and 2.5 V, sensing electrograms and lead impedances were measured at implant and repeated 1,3,6,12,18 and 24 months after CRT-P. Electrophysiological measurements of leads located in RV-A and RV-HS were analyzed retrospectively. Bipolar RV leads were used, including high impedance leads, passive fixation and active fixation. Results: RV pacing leads were implanted in RV-A (n=79) and RV-HS (n=156). Average RV pacing thresholds from CRT implant procedure to 24-month follow-up at 0.5 ms were 0.77±0.69 V in RV-A and 0.71±0.35 V in RV-HS (P=0.31), and at 2.5 V were 0.06±0.08 ms in RV-A and 0.07±0.05 ms in RV-HS (P=0.12). Average RV electrogram amplitudes from baseline to 24 months after CRT were 15.3±6.9 mV in RV-A and 12.1±6.0 mV in RV-HS (P=0.55). Average RV impedances during follow-up were 850±286Ω in RV-A and 618±147Ω in RV-HS (P=0.57). Similar RV lead revisions between RV-A and RV-HS were observed after 2-year follow-up (P=0.55). Conclusions: The RV-HS lead position demonstrated stable and acceptable long-term pacing and sensing function, with rates of complications comparable to conventional RV-A lead position in CRT. The RV-HS lead position is feasible in CRT-P.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216304582CRTRight ventricular pacingThresholdSensingImpedanceComplication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H.M. Kristiansen, MD
T. Hovstad, MD
G. Vollan, MD
S. Faerestrand, MD, PhD
spellingShingle H.M. Kristiansen, MD
T. Hovstad, MD
G. Vollan, MD
S. Faerestrand, MD, PhD
Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
CRT
Right ventricular pacing
Threshold
Sensing
Impedance
Complication
author_facet H.M. Kristiansen, MD
T. Hovstad, MD
G. Vollan, MD
S. Faerestrand, MD, PhD
author_sort H.M. Kristiansen, MD
title Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_short Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_full Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_fullStr Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Right Ventricular Pacing and Sensing Function in High Posterior Septal and Apical Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_sort right ventricular pacing and sensing function in high posterior septal and apical lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
issn 0972-6292
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: The conventional right ventricular (RV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) is the RV apex (RV-A). Little is known about electrophysiological stability and associated complications of pacing leads in RV high posterior septal (RV-HS) position in CRT-P. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-five consecutive CRT-P patients were included from 1999-2010. Pacing thresholds at 0.5 ms and 2.5 V, sensing electrograms and lead impedances were measured at implant and repeated 1,3,6,12,18 and 24 months after CRT-P. Electrophysiological measurements of leads located in RV-A and RV-HS were analyzed retrospectively. Bipolar RV leads were used, including high impedance leads, passive fixation and active fixation. Results: RV pacing leads were implanted in RV-A (n=79) and RV-HS (n=156). Average RV pacing thresholds from CRT implant procedure to 24-month follow-up at 0.5 ms were 0.77±0.69 V in RV-A and 0.71±0.35 V in RV-HS (P=0.31), and at 2.5 V were 0.06±0.08 ms in RV-A and 0.07±0.05 ms in RV-HS (P=0.12). Average RV electrogram amplitudes from baseline to 24 months after CRT were 15.3±6.9 mV in RV-A and 12.1±6.0 mV in RV-HS (P=0.55). Average RV impedances during follow-up were 850±286Ω in RV-A and 618±147Ω in RV-HS (P=0.57). Similar RV lead revisions between RV-A and RV-HS were observed after 2-year follow-up (P=0.55). Conclusions: The RV-HS lead position demonstrated stable and acceptable long-term pacing and sensing function, with rates of complications comparable to conventional RV-A lead position in CRT. The RV-HS lead position is feasible in CRT-P.
topic CRT
Right ventricular pacing
Threshold
Sensing
Impedance
Complication
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216304582
work_keys_str_mv AT hmkristiansenmd rightventricularpacingandsensingfunctioninhighposteriorseptalandapicalleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT thovstadmd rightventricularpacingandsensingfunctioninhighposteriorseptalandapicalleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT gvollanmd rightventricularpacingandsensingfunctioninhighposteriorseptalandapicalleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sfaerestrandmdphd rightventricularpacingandsensingfunctioninhighposteriorseptalandapicalleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapy
_version_ 1725719422198349824