Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report

Abstract Background Identifying the precise location of the lower ureter is crucial in not only ureteral surgeries but also the other surgeries that may cause ureteral injury. Although a variety of approaches have been applied to detect the location of the lower ureter, the majority of them had an a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamidreza Zia, Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh, Fatemeh Khatami, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-07-01
Series:African Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00201-6
id doaj-03468700731c496193c670b1163e752b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03468700731c496193c670b1163e752b2021-07-25T11:16:07ZengSpringerOpenAfrican Journal of Urology1110-57041961-99872021-07-012711410.1186/s12301-021-00201-6Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series reportHamidreza Zia0Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh1Fatemeh Khatami2Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir3Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesUrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesUrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesUrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background Identifying the precise location of the lower ureter is crucial in not only ureteral surgeries but also the other surgeries that may cause ureteral injury. Although a variety of approaches have been applied to detect the location of the lower ureter, the majority of them had an association with several complications or be difficult to perform perfectly or be time-consuming. Case presentation Seven patients with distal ureteric stones of the size ranged from 2 to 3 cm. All patients entered the study after signing the informed consent, and the case report is based on CARE guidelines. After specifying the inner ring of the inguinal canal, the posterior peritoneum was opened and dissected from an area of 2 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the inner ring. Thereafter, the stone was extracted from the precise location of them, which was identified by ureteral pinching. Conclusion We assumed that we were easily able to identify the site of the lower ureter through 2 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the inner ring. The result of our study on seven patients demonstrated that this maneuver can minimize the time of surgery and no complications have been seen while this approach was applied.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00201-6Laparoscopic ureterolithotomySurgeryCase series
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamidreza Zia
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh
Fatemeh Khatami
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
spellingShingle Hamidreza Zia
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh
Fatemeh Khatami
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
African Journal of Urology
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
Surgery
Case series
author_facet Hamidreza Zia
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh
Fatemeh Khatami
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
author_sort Hamidreza Zia
title Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
title_short Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
title_full Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
title_fullStr Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
title_sort laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large lower ureteral stone: a case series report
publisher SpringerOpen
series African Journal of Urology
issn 1110-5704
1961-9987
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Identifying the precise location of the lower ureter is crucial in not only ureteral surgeries but also the other surgeries that may cause ureteral injury. Although a variety of approaches have been applied to detect the location of the lower ureter, the majority of them had an association with several complications or be difficult to perform perfectly or be time-consuming. Case presentation Seven patients with distal ureteric stones of the size ranged from 2 to 3 cm. All patients entered the study after signing the informed consent, and the case report is based on CARE guidelines. After specifying the inner ring of the inguinal canal, the posterior peritoneum was opened and dissected from an area of 2 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the inner ring. Thereafter, the stone was extracted from the precise location of them, which was identified by ureteral pinching. Conclusion We assumed that we were easily able to identify the site of the lower ureter through 2 cm medial and 2 cm inferior to the inner ring. The result of our study on seven patients demonstrated that this maneuver can minimize the time of surgery and no complications have been seen while this approach was applied.
topic Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
Surgery
Case series
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00201-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidrezazia laparoscopicureterolithotomyforlargelowerureteralstoneacaseseriesreport
AT seyedsaeedtamehrizadeh laparoscopicureterolithotomyforlargelowerureteralstoneacaseseriesreport
AT fatemehkhatami laparoscopicureterolithotomyforlargelowerureteralstoneacaseseriesreport
AT seyedmohammadkazemaghamir laparoscopicureterolithotomyforlargelowerureteralstoneacaseseriesreport
_version_ 1721283258947207168