Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
This paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB pl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Risks |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77 |
id |
doaj-033ee86336d34071aaadd40568ae0fc4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-033ee86336d34071aaadd40568ae0fc42020-11-24T23:46:52ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912015-03-01317710210.3390/risks3010077risks3010077Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension PlansAn Chen0Filip Uzelac1Faculty of Mathematics and Economics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89069 Ulm, GermanyGerman Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bafin), 53117 Bonn, GermanyThis paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB plans carry portability risks, whereas DC plans bear asset price risk. We model these tradeoffs explicitly in this paper and compare these two plans in a utility-based framework. Our numerical analysis focuses on answering the question of when the beneficiary is indifferent between the DB and DC plan. Most of our results confirm the findings in the existing literature, among which, e.g., portability losses considerably reduce the relative attractiveness of the DB plan. However, we also find that the attractiveness of the DB plan can decrease in the level of risk aversion, which is inconsistent with the existing literature.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77defined benefit plandefined contribution planportability riskasset price risksalary risk |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
An Chen Filip Uzelac |
spellingShingle |
An Chen Filip Uzelac Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans Risks defined benefit plan defined contribution plan portability risk asset price risk salary risk |
author_facet |
An Chen Filip Uzelac |
author_sort |
An Chen |
title |
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans |
title_short |
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans |
title_full |
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans |
title_fullStr |
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans |
title_full_unstemmed |
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans |
title_sort |
portability, salary and asset price risk: a continuous-time expected utility comparison of db and dc pension plans |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Risks |
issn |
2227-9091 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
This paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB plans carry portability risks, whereas DC plans bear asset price risk. We model these tradeoffs explicitly in this paper and compare these two plans in a utility-based framework. Our numerical analysis focuses on answering the question of when the beneficiary is indifferent between the DB and DC plan. Most of our results confirm the findings in the existing literature, among which, e.g., portability losses considerably reduce the relative attractiveness of the DB plan. However, we also find that the attractiveness of the DB plan can decrease in the level of risk aversion, which is inconsistent with the existing literature. |
topic |
defined benefit plan defined contribution plan portability risk asset price risk salary risk |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anchen portabilitysalaryandassetpriceriskacontinuoustimeexpectedutilitycomparisonofdbanddcpensionplans AT filipuzelac portabilitysalaryandassetpriceriskacontinuoustimeexpectedutilitycomparisonofdbanddcpensionplans |
_version_ |
1725491959266541568 |