Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans

This paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: An Chen, Filip Uzelac
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-03-01
Series:Risks
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77
id doaj-033ee86336d34071aaadd40568ae0fc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-033ee86336d34071aaadd40568ae0fc42020-11-24T23:46:52ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912015-03-01317710210.3390/risks3010077risks3010077Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension PlansAn Chen0Filip Uzelac1Faculty of Mathematics and Economics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89069 Ulm, GermanyGerman Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bafin), 53117 Bonn, GermanyThis paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB plans carry portability risks, whereas DC plans bear asset price risk. We model these tradeoffs explicitly in this paper and compare these two plans in a utility-based framework. Our numerical analysis focuses on answering the question of when the beneficiary is indifferent between the DB and DC plan. Most of our results confirm the findings in the existing literature, among which, e.g., portability losses considerably reduce the relative attractiveness of the DB plan. However, we also find that the attractiveness of the DB plan can decrease in the level of risk aversion, which is inconsistent with the existing literature.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77defined benefit plandefined contribution planportability riskasset price risksalary risk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author An Chen
Filip Uzelac
spellingShingle An Chen
Filip Uzelac
Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
Risks
defined benefit plan
defined contribution plan
portability risk
asset price risk
salary risk
author_facet An Chen
Filip Uzelac
author_sort An Chen
title Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
title_short Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
title_full Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
title_fullStr Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
title_full_unstemmed Portability, Salary and Asset Price Risk: A Continuous-Time Expected Utility Comparison of DB and DC Pension Plans
title_sort portability, salary and asset price risk: a continuous-time expected utility comparison of db and dc pension plans
publisher MDPI AG
series Risks
issn 2227-9091
publishDate 2015-03-01
description This paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB plans carry portability risks, whereas DC plans bear asset price risk. We model these tradeoffs explicitly in this paper and compare these two plans in a utility-based framework. Our numerical analysis focuses on answering the question of when the beneficiary is indifferent between the DB and DC plan. Most of our results confirm the findings in the existing literature, among which, e.g., portability losses considerably reduce the relative attractiveness of the DB plan. However, we also find that the attractiveness of the DB plan can decrease in the level of risk aversion, which is inconsistent with the existing literature.
topic defined benefit plan
defined contribution plan
portability risk
asset price risk
salary risk
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/3/1/77
work_keys_str_mv AT anchen portabilitysalaryandassetpriceriskacontinuoustimeexpectedutilitycomparisonofdbanddcpensionplans
AT filipuzelac portabilitysalaryandassetpriceriskacontinuoustimeexpectedutilitycomparisonofdbanddcpensionplans
_version_ 1725491959266541568