L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?

The Empire of Value proposes a criticism of walrasian utility theory and offers a substitute through the alternative assumption of mimetic desire. This critic is examined in three steps. First, we discuss the identification and interpretation that Orléan proposes of the walrasian assumptions: prefer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Claire Pignol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2012-12-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9865
id doaj-0334825f2dab4029b6532f41c7eaf6b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0334825f2dab4029b6532f41c7eaf6b32021-08-02T23:37:56ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962012-12-011210.4000/regulation.9865L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?Claire PignolThe Empire of Value proposes a criticism of walrasian utility theory and offers a substitute through the alternative assumption of mimetic desire. This critic is examined in three steps. First, we discuss the identification and interpretation that Orléan proposes of the walrasian assumptions: preferences’ objectivity and convexity; consumer’s sovereignty. Second, we examine the impact of the mimetic assumption’s consequences on equilibrium efficiency and stability. Third, we reword this criticism in terms of questioning instead of assumptions and results. This questioning concerns both the agents’ frustration and the social world’s pacification that can be deduced from.http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9865Utilityconsumer’s sovereigntymimetic desireWalras
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claire Pignol
spellingShingle Claire Pignol
L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
Revue de la Régulation
Utility
consumer’s sovereignty
mimetic desire
Walras
author_facet Claire Pignol
author_sort Claire Pignol
title L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
title_short L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
title_full L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
title_fullStr L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
title_full_unstemmed L’empire de la valeur. Quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
title_sort l’empire de la valeur. quelle critique de la théorie (néo)-walrassienne ?
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
series Revue de la Régulation
issn 1957-7796
publishDate 2012-12-01
description The Empire of Value proposes a criticism of walrasian utility theory and offers a substitute through the alternative assumption of mimetic desire. This critic is examined in three steps. First, we discuss the identification and interpretation that Orléan proposes of the walrasian assumptions: preferences’ objectivity and convexity; consumer’s sovereignty. Second, we examine the impact of the mimetic assumption’s consequences on equilibrium efficiency and stability. Third, we reword this criticism in terms of questioning instead of assumptions and results. This questioning concerns both the agents’ frustration and the social world’s pacification that can be deduced from.
topic Utility
consumer’s sovereignty
mimetic desire
Walras
url http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9865
work_keys_str_mv AT clairepignol lempiredelavaleurquellecritiquedelatheorieneowalrassienne
_version_ 1721225356252282880