The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.

Interval-type exercise is effective for improving glycemic control, but the optimal approach is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the interval length on changes in postprandial glycemic control following a single exercise bout. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida Jakobsen, Thomas P J Solomon, Kristian Karstoft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047444?pdf=render
id doaj-032b36d754084f3fa781003d0aed8c9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-032b36d754084f3fa781003d0aed8c9f2020-11-25T02:13:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011110e016356210.1371/journal.pone.0163562The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.Ida JakobsenThomas P J SolomonKristian KarstoftInterval-type exercise is effective for improving glycemic control, but the optimal approach is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the interval length on changes in postprandial glycemic control following a single exercise bout. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes completed a cross-over study with three 1-hour interventions performed in a non-randomized but counter-balanced order: 1) Interval walking consisting of repeated cycles of 3 min slow (aiming for 54% of Peak oxygen consumption rate [VO2peak]) and 3 min fast (aiming for 89% of VO2peak) walking (IW3); 2) Interval walking consisting of repeated cycles of 1 min slow and 1 min fast walking (IW1) and 3) No walking (CON). The exercise interventions were matched with regards to walking speed, and VO2 and heart rate was assessed throughout all interventions. A 4-hour liquid mixed meal tolerance test commenced 30 min after each intervention, with blood samples taken regularly. IW3 and IW1 resulted in comparable mean VO2 and heart rates. Overall mean postprandial blood glucose levels were lower after IW3 compared to CON (10.3±3.0 vs. 11.1±3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05), with no significant differences between IW1 (10.5±2.8 mmol/L) and CON or IW3 and IW1 (P > 0.05 for both). Conversely blood glucose levels at specific time points during the MMTT differed significantly following both IW3 and IW1 as compared to CON. Our findings support the previously found blood glucose lowering effect of IW3 and suggest that reducing the interval length, while keeping the walking speed and time spend on fast and slow walking constant, does not result in additional improvements. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02257190.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047444?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ida Jakobsen
Thomas P J Solomon
Kristian Karstoft
spellingShingle Ida Jakobsen
Thomas P J Solomon
Kristian Karstoft
The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ida Jakobsen
Thomas P J Solomon
Kristian Karstoft
author_sort Ida Jakobsen
title The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
title_short The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
title_full The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
title_fullStr The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
title_full_unstemmed The Acute Effects of Interval-Type Exercise on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects: Importance of Interval Length. A Controlled, Counterbalanced, Crossover Study.
title_sort acute effects of interval-type exercise on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes subjects: importance of interval length. a controlled, counterbalanced, crossover study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Interval-type exercise is effective for improving glycemic control, but the optimal approach is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the interval length on changes in postprandial glycemic control following a single exercise bout. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes completed a cross-over study with three 1-hour interventions performed in a non-randomized but counter-balanced order: 1) Interval walking consisting of repeated cycles of 3 min slow (aiming for 54% of Peak oxygen consumption rate [VO2peak]) and 3 min fast (aiming for 89% of VO2peak) walking (IW3); 2) Interval walking consisting of repeated cycles of 1 min slow and 1 min fast walking (IW1) and 3) No walking (CON). The exercise interventions were matched with regards to walking speed, and VO2 and heart rate was assessed throughout all interventions. A 4-hour liquid mixed meal tolerance test commenced 30 min after each intervention, with blood samples taken regularly. IW3 and IW1 resulted in comparable mean VO2 and heart rates. Overall mean postprandial blood glucose levels were lower after IW3 compared to CON (10.3±3.0 vs. 11.1±3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05), with no significant differences between IW1 (10.5±2.8 mmol/L) and CON or IW3 and IW1 (P > 0.05 for both). Conversely blood glucose levels at specific time points during the MMTT differed significantly following both IW3 and IW1 as compared to CON. Our findings support the previously found blood glucose lowering effect of IW3 and suggest that reducing the interval length, while keeping the walking speed and time spend on fast and slow walking constant, does not result in additional improvements. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02257190.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5047444?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT idajakobsen theacuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
AT thomaspjsolomon theacuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
AT kristiankarstoft theacuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
AT idajakobsen acuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
AT thomaspjsolomon acuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
AT kristiankarstoft acuteeffectsofintervaltypeexerciseonglycemiccontrolintype2diabetessubjectsimportanceofintervallengthacontrolledcounterbalancedcrossoverstudy
_version_ 1724904957702832128