Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions

The test of understanding graphs in kinematics (TUG-K) has widely been used to assess students’ understanding of this subject. The TUG-K poses different objectives to the test takers such as (1) the selection of a graph from a textual description, (2) the selection of corresponding graphs, and (3) t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Klein, S. Becker, S. Küchemann, J. Kuhn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2021-03-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102
id doaj-032a213d51394c5f8f1714ed3502fd86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-032a213d51394c5f8f1714ed3502fd862021-03-17T14:12:42ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962021-03-0117101310210.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitionsP. KleinS. BeckerS. KüchemannJ. KuhnThe test of understanding graphs in kinematics (TUG-K) has widely been used to assess students’ understanding of this subject. The TUG-K poses different objectives to the test takers such as (1) the selection of a graph from a textual description, (2) the selection of corresponding graphs, and (3) the selection of a textual description from a graph. Whether test takers follow these task requirements is usually inferred from evaluating the test scores as correct or incorrect, yet the process of how students actually interact with the different tasks remains unknown. Recent studies have shown that eye tracking can provide rich insight into student’s interaction with multiple-choice tasks. In the current work, we analyzed the eye movement patterns of N=115 high school students while solving the TUG-K. Each question was divided into a question area (Q) and an option area (O), then gaze transitions between Q and O and between different options were calculated. A cluster analysis using the transition metrics revealed three item groups, containing the aforementioned objectives of the items. The clusters remain stable for different subsamples of our dataset, for instance, considering only the correct or only the incorrect responses, or considering high- or low-confidence responses. We conclude that eye movements can reflect task demands on a procedural level well beyond the classical methods of evaluating test scores, eventually making eye tracking an additional method for item analysis that can be utilized to confirm or explore test and item structures.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Klein
S. Becker
S. Küchemann
J. Kuhn
spellingShingle P. Klein
S. Becker
S. Küchemann
J. Kuhn
Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet P. Klein
S. Becker
S. Küchemann
J. Kuhn
author_sort P. Klein
title Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
title_short Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
title_full Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
title_fullStr Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
title_full_unstemmed Test of understanding graphs in kinematics: Item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
title_sort test of understanding graphs in kinematics: item objectives confirmed by clustering eye movement transitions
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The test of understanding graphs in kinematics (TUG-K) has widely been used to assess students’ understanding of this subject. The TUG-K poses different objectives to the test takers such as (1) the selection of a graph from a textual description, (2) the selection of corresponding graphs, and (3) the selection of a textual description from a graph. Whether test takers follow these task requirements is usually inferred from evaluating the test scores as correct or incorrect, yet the process of how students actually interact with the different tasks remains unknown. Recent studies have shown that eye tracking can provide rich insight into student’s interaction with multiple-choice tasks. In the current work, we analyzed the eye movement patterns of N=115 high school students while solving the TUG-K. Each question was divided into a question area (Q) and an option area (O), then gaze transitions between Q and O and between different options were calculated. A cluster analysis using the transition metrics revealed three item groups, containing the aforementioned objectives of the items. The clusters remain stable for different subsamples of our dataset, for instance, considering only the correct or only the incorrect responses, or considering high- or low-confidence responses. We conclude that eye movements can reflect task demands on a procedural level well beyond the classical methods of evaluating test scores, eventually making eye tracking an additional method for item analysis that can be utilized to confirm or explore test and item structures.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.013102
work_keys_str_mv AT pklein testofunderstandinggraphsinkinematicsitemobjectivesconfirmedbyclusteringeyemovementtransitions
AT sbecker testofunderstandinggraphsinkinematicsitemobjectivesconfirmedbyclusteringeyemovementtransitions
AT skuchemann testofunderstandinggraphsinkinematicsitemobjectivesconfirmedbyclusteringeyemovementtransitions
AT jkuhn testofunderstandinggraphsinkinematicsitemobjectivesconfirmedbyclusteringeyemovementtransitions
_version_ 1724218370731016192