Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders

Within all classrooms of public schools, teachers greet general education students acknowledging broad differences in their learning readiness and social skills (Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2010; Martin, 2010). The needs of some students may be so diverse that educators find implementing differenti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bret G. Range, Dorothy Jean Yocom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ralph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State University 2012-10-01
Series:School Leadership Review
Online Access:https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=slr
id doaj-03271c1a60d849de871e38acbc9f3026
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03271c1a60d849de871e38acbc9f30262020-11-25T01:18:34ZengRalph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State UniversitySchool Leadership Review1559-49982012-10-01723448Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School LeadersBret G. Range0Dorothy Jean Yocom1University of WyomingUniversity of WyomingWithin all classrooms of public schools, teachers greet general education students acknowledging broad differences in their learning readiness and social skills (Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2010; Martin, 2010). The needs of some students may be so diverse that educators find implementing differentiated instructional strategies with integrity extremely difficult. Many individually research-based strategies have been implemented to provide helpful instruction to all learners. This paper presents the concept of a merger between two of these strategies: Response to Intervention (RTI) and grade retention. As a result, the conceptual framework for this manuscript is anchored within the RTI and grade retention literatures, highlighting their reported effectiveness on student outcomes.https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=slr
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bret G. Range
Dorothy Jean Yocom
spellingShingle Bret G. Range
Dorothy Jean Yocom
Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
School Leadership Review
author_facet Bret G. Range
Dorothy Jean Yocom
author_sort Bret G. Range
title Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
title_short Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
title_full Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
title_fullStr Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
title_full_unstemmed Connecting Response to Intervention and Grade Retention: Implications for School Leaders
title_sort connecting response to intervention and grade retention: implications for school leaders
publisher Ralph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State University
series School Leadership Review
issn 1559-4998
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Within all classrooms of public schools, teachers greet general education students acknowledging broad differences in their learning readiness and social skills (Fuchs, Fuchs, & Compton, 2010; Martin, 2010). The needs of some students may be so diverse that educators find implementing differentiated instructional strategies with integrity extremely difficult. Many individually research-based strategies have been implemented to provide helpful instruction to all learners. This paper presents the concept of a merger between two of these strategies: Response to Intervention (RTI) and grade retention. As a result, the conceptual framework for this manuscript is anchored within the RTI and grade retention literatures, highlighting their reported effectiveness on student outcomes.
url https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=slr
work_keys_str_mv AT bretgrange connectingresponsetointerventionandgraderetentionimplicationsforschoolleaders
AT dorothyjeanyocom connectingresponsetointerventionandgraderetentionimplicationsforschoolleaders
_version_ 1725141855833686016