The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees.
Workaholism has become an increasingly popular area for empirical study. However, most studies examining the prevalence of workaholism have used non-representative samples and measures with poorly defined cut-off scores. To overcome these methodological limitations, a nationally representative surve...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4131865?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-02eaa6685133445fb0d8e39ab60813ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-02eaa6685133445fb0d8e39ab60813ae2020-11-25T01:27:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10244610.1371/journal.pone.0102446The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees.Cecilie Schou AndreassenMark D GriffithsJørn HetlandLuca KravinaFredrik JensenStåle PallesenWorkaholism has become an increasingly popular area for empirical study. However, most studies examining the prevalence of workaholism have used non-representative samples and measures with poorly defined cut-off scores. To overcome these methodological limitations, a nationally representative survey among employees in Norway (N = 1,124) was conducted. Questions relating to gender, age, marital status, caretaker responsibility for children, percentage of full-time equivalent, and educational level were asked. Workaholism was assessed by the use of a psychometrically validated instrument (i.e., Bergen Work Addiction Scale). Personality was assessed using the Mini-International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that the prevalence of workaholism was 8.3% (95% CI = 6.7-9.9%). An adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that workaholism was negatively related to age and positively related to the personality dimensions agreeableness, neuroticism, and intellect/imagination. Implications for these findings are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4131865?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cecilie Schou Andreassen Mark D Griffiths Jørn Hetland Luca Kravina Fredrik Jensen Ståle Pallesen |
spellingShingle |
Cecilie Schou Andreassen Mark D Griffiths Jørn Hetland Luca Kravina Fredrik Jensen Ståle Pallesen The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Cecilie Schou Andreassen Mark D Griffiths Jørn Hetland Luca Kravina Fredrik Jensen Ståle Pallesen |
author_sort |
Cecilie Schou Andreassen |
title |
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. |
title_short |
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. |
title_full |
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. |
title_fullStr |
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees. |
title_sort |
prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of norwegian employees. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Workaholism has become an increasingly popular area for empirical study. However, most studies examining the prevalence of workaholism have used non-representative samples and measures with poorly defined cut-off scores. To overcome these methodological limitations, a nationally representative survey among employees in Norway (N = 1,124) was conducted. Questions relating to gender, age, marital status, caretaker responsibility for children, percentage of full-time equivalent, and educational level were asked. Workaholism was assessed by the use of a psychometrically validated instrument (i.e., Bergen Work Addiction Scale). Personality was assessed using the Mini-International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that the prevalence of workaholism was 8.3% (95% CI = 6.7-9.9%). An adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that workaholism was negatively related to age and positively related to the personality dimensions agreeableness, neuroticism, and intellect/imagination. Implications for these findings are discussed. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4131865?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cecilieschouandreassen theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT markdgriffiths theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT jørnhetland theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT lucakravina theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT fredrikjensen theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT stalepallesen theprevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT cecilieschouandreassen prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT markdgriffiths prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT jørnhetland prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT lucakravina prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT fredrikjensen prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees AT stalepallesen prevalenceofworkaholismasurveystudyinanationallyrepresentativesampleofnorwegianemployees |
_version_ |
1725104794534674432 |