An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning

Background: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Qasem Hanafi, Ahmad Fakhrizadeh, Esmat Jaafaezadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=Hanafi
id doaj-02e0295d01b2441a9e96e6931c29ff20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02e0295d01b2441a9e96e6931c29ff202020-11-24T22:02:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632019-01-018240140610.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanningMohammad Qasem HanafiAhmad FakhrizadehEsmat JaafaezadehBackground: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. Results: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=HanafiColor Doppler ultrasoundtwinkling artifactunenhanced computed tomographyurolithiasis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Qasem Hanafi
Ahmad Fakhrizadeh
Esmat Jaafaezadeh
spellingShingle Mohammad Qasem Hanafi
Ahmad Fakhrizadeh
Esmat Jaafaezadeh
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Color Doppler ultrasound
twinkling artifact
unenhanced computed tomography
urolithiasis
author_facet Mohammad Qasem Hanafi
Ahmad Fakhrizadeh
Esmat Jaafaezadeh
author_sort Mohammad Qasem Hanafi
title An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_short An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_full An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_fullStr An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_full_unstemmed An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_sort investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
issn 2249-4863
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. Results: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm.
topic Color Doppler ultrasound
twinkling artifact
unenhanced computed tomography
urolithiasis
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=Hanafi
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadqasemhanafi aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT ahmadfakhrizadeh aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT esmatjaafaezadeh aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT mohammadqasemhanafi investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT ahmadfakhrizadeh investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT esmatjaafaezadeh investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
_version_ 1725836222000005120