An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
Background: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT)...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=Hanafi |
id |
doaj-02e0295d01b2441a9e96e6931c29ff20 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-02e0295d01b2441a9e96e6931c29ff202020-11-24T22:02:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632019-01-018240140610.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanningMohammad Qasem HanafiAhmad FakhrizadehEsmat JaafaezadehBackground: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. Results: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=HanafiColor Doppler ultrasoundtwinkling artifactunenhanced computed tomographyurolithiasis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohammad Qasem Hanafi Ahmad Fakhrizadeh Esmat Jaafaezadeh |
spellingShingle |
Mohammad Qasem Hanafi Ahmad Fakhrizadeh Esmat Jaafaezadeh An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact unenhanced computed tomography urolithiasis |
author_facet |
Mohammad Qasem Hanafi Ahmad Fakhrizadeh Esmat Jaafaezadeh |
author_sort |
Mohammad Qasem Hanafi |
title |
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_short |
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_full |
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_fullStr |
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_full_unstemmed |
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_sort |
investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care |
issn |
2249-4863 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. Results: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm. |
topic |
Color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact unenhanced computed tomography urolithiasis |
url |
http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=2;spage=401;epage=406;aulast=Hanafi |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohammadqasemhanafi aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT ahmadfakhrizadeh aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT esmatjaafaezadeh aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT mohammadqasemhanafi investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT ahmadfakhrizadeh investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT esmatjaafaezadeh investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning |
_version_ |
1725836222000005120 |