Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach
Stormwater tank performance significantly depends on management practices. This paper proposes a procedure to assess tank efficiency in terms of volume and pollutant concentration using four different capture tank management protocols. The comparison of the efficiency results reveals that, as expect...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-10-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1699 |
id |
doaj-02d97afe9f614b338c46c79ac85aa89c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-02d97afe9f614b338c46c79ac85aa89c2020-11-25T00:07:07ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412013-10-01541699171110.3390/w5041699Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical ApproachFlavio De MartinoFrancesco De PaolaStormwater tank performance significantly depends on management practices. This paper proposes a procedure to assess tank efficiency in terms of volume and pollutant concentration using four different capture tank management protocols. The comparison of the efficiency results reveals that, as expected, a combined bypass—stormwater tank system achieves better results than a tank alone. The management practices tested for the tank-only systems provide notably different efficiency results. The practice of immediately emptying after the end of the event exhibits significant levels of efficiency and operational advantages. All other configurations exhibit either significant operational problems or very low performances. The continuous simulation and semi-probabilistic approach for the best tank management practice are compared. The semi-probabilistic approach is based on a Weibull probabilistic model of the main characteristics of the rainfall process. Following this approach, efficiency indexes were established. The comparison with continuous simulations shows the reliability of the probabilistic approach even if this last is certainly very site sensitive.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1699water pollution and remediationmanagement practicesefficiency controlbasin pollution control |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Flavio De Martino Francesco De Paola |
spellingShingle |
Flavio De Martino Francesco De Paola Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach Water water pollution and remediation management practices efficiency control basin pollution control |
author_facet |
Flavio De Martino Francesco De Paola |
author_sort |
Flavio De Martino |
title |
Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach |
title_short |
Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach |
title_full |
Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach |
title_fullStr |
Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stormwater Tank Performance: Design and Management Criteria for Capture Tanks Using a Continuous Simulation and a Semi-Probabilistic Analytical Approach |
title_sort |
stormwater tank performance: design and management criteria for capture tanks using a continuous simulation and a semi-probabilistic analytical approach |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2013-10-01 |
description |
Stormwater tank performance significantly depends on management practices. This paper proposes a procedure to assess tank efficiency in terms of volume and pollutant concentration using four different capture tank management protocols. The comparison of the efficiency results reveals that, as expected, a combined bypass—stormwater tank system achieves better results than a tank alone. The management practices tested for the tank-only systems provide notably different efficiency results. The practice of immediately emptying after the end of the event exhibits significant levels of efficiency and operational advantages. All other configurations exhibit either significant operational problems or very low performances. The continuous simulation and semi-probabilistic approach for the best tank management practice are compared. The semi-probabilistic approach is based on a Weibull probabilistic model of the main characteristics of the rainfall process. Following this approach, efficiency indexes were established. The comparison with continuous simulations shows the reliability of the probabilistic approach even if this last is certainly very site sensitive. |
topic |
water pollution and remediation management practices efficiency control basin pollution control |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/4/1699 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT flaviodemartino stormwatertankperformancedesignandmanagementcriteriaforcapturetanksusingacontinuoussimulationandasemiprobabilisticanalyticalapproach AT francescodepaola stormwatertankperformancedesignandmanagementcriteriaforcapturetanksusingacontinuoussimulationandasemiprobabilisticanalyticalapproach |
_version_ |
1725419958792355840 |