Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival of advanced breast cancer patients in China

Background: There is a lack of prognostic models predicting the overall survival (OS) of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients in China. Methods: Data from the China National Cancer Center database that recorded 4039 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1987 and 2019 were extracted and a to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaoyan Lin, Hongnan Mo, Yiqun Li, Xiuwen Guan, Yimeng Chen, Zijing Wang, Peng Yuan, Jiayu Wang, Yang Luo, Ying Fan, Ruigang Cai, Qiao Li, Shanshan Chen, Pin Zhang, Qing Li, Fei Ma, Binghe Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301570
Description
Summary:Background: There is a lack of prognostic models predicting the overall survival (OS) of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients in China. Methods: Data from the China National Cancer Center database that recorded 4039 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1987 and 2019 were extracted and a total of 2263 ABC participants were enrolled in this study, which were further randomized 3:1 and divided into training (n = 1706) and validation (n = 557) groups. The nomogram was built based on independent predictors identified by univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses. The discriminatory and predictive capacities of the nomogram were assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses found that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, T-stage, N-stage, tumor subtype, the presence of distant lymph node (DLN)/liver/brain metastasis, local therapy, efficacy of first-line therapy and metastatic-free interval (MFI) were significantly related to OS (all P < 0.05). These variables were incorporated into a nomogram to predict the 2-year and 3-year OS of ABC patients. The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.700 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.683–0.717) for the training set and 0.686 (95% CI: 0.652–0.719) for the validation set. The calibration curves revealed satisfactory consistency between actual survival and nomogram prediction in both the internal and external validations. The nomogram was capable of stratifying patients into different risk cohorts. Conclusions: We constructed and validated a nomogram that might serve as an efficient tool to provide prognostic prediction for ABC patients and guide the physicians to make personalized treatment decisions.
ISSN:1532-3080