Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa

Abstract Micronutrient malnutrition is one of the most serious health challenges facing vast sectors of Africa's population, particularly resource‐poor women and children. Development and utilization of drought‐tolerant, biofortified varieties is probably the most effective, sustainable, and po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul M. Kimani, AHMED Warsame
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-11-01
Series:Food and Energy Security
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.173
id doaj-02a065206bf642298ac10c9c2f1c35b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02a065206bf642298ac10c9c2f1c35b32021-06-16T06:05:43ZengWileyFood and Energy Security2048-36942019-11-0184n/an/a10.1002/fes3.173Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for AfricaPaul M. Kimani0AHMED Warsame1Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences University of Nairobi Nairobi KenyaDepartment of Plant Science and Crop Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences University of Nairobi Nairobi KenyaAbstract Micronutrient malnutrition is one of the most serious health challenges facing vast sectors of Africa's population, particularly resource‐poor women and children. Development and utilization of drought‐tolerant, biofortified varieties is probably the most effective, sustainable, and potentially long‐lasting strategy for reducing micronutrient deficiencies and coping with frequent droughts. Our objective was to develop second‐generation biofortified bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties combining drought tolerance, multiple disease resistance, and higher concentrations of iron and zinc in grain than the first‐generation varieties currently grown by farmers in east, central, and west Africa. Forty‐seven F2 populations segregating for mineral density, resistance to biotic and abiotic stress factors, marketable grain types, and yield potential were developed at Kabete Field Station, and advanced to F4 as population bulks. During the 2010 long rain season, 6,612 F4 single plants were selected and used to establish F4.5 progeny rows during the 2011 short rain season at Kabete. These progenies were evaluated for resistance to angular leaf spot, anthracnose, root rots, and agronomic traits. In 2012, 102 F4.6 lines were evaluated under drought stress and no‐stress conditions at Kabete and Thika. During the 2012 short rain season, selected disease and drought‐tolerant F4.7 lines were evaluated for mineral density and for their agronomic potential at four locations representing major bean production environments. Results showed significant (p < 0.01) variation for mineral density, drought tolerance, disease resistance, growth habit, grain type, and maturity among the populations and their progenies. Iron concentration varied from 30 to 130 ppm. Zinc concentration varied from 10 to 60 ppm. Superior lines were selected from BF01, BF07, BF16, and BF36 populations. Eighty‐four lines had 50% more yield under stress and no‐stress conditions compared with the parental lines, suggesting transgressive segregation. Results indicate that varieties combining high micronutrient density, resistance to diseases and drought, and marketable grain types can be developed from these populations.https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.173beanbiofortificationdisease resistancedrought tolerance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul M. Kimani
AHMED Warsame
spellingShingle Paul M. Kimani
AHMED Warsame
Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
Food and Energy Security
bean
biofortification
disease resistance
drought tolerance
author_facet Paul M. Kimani
AHMED Warsame
author_sort Paul M. Kimani
title Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
title_short Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
title_full Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
title_fullStr Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
title_full_unstemmed Breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for Africa
title_sort breeding second‐generation biofortified bean varieties for africa
publisher Wiley
series Food and Energy Security
issn 2048-3694
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Micronutrient malnutrition is one of the most serious health challenges facing vast sectors of Africa's population, particularly resource‐poor women and children. Development and utilization of drought‐tolerant, biofortified varieties is probably the most effective, sustainable, and potentially long‐lasting strategy for reducing micronutrient deficiencies and coping with frequent droughts. Our objective was to develop second‐generation biofortified bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties combining drought tolerance, multiple disease resistance, and higher concentrations of iron and zinc in grain than the first‐generation varieties currently grown by farmers in east, central, and west Africa. Forty‐seven F2 populations segregating for mineral density, resistance to biotic and abiotic stress factors, marketable grain types, and yield potential were developed at Kabete Field Station, and advanced to F4 as population bulks. During the 2010 long rain season, 6,612 F4 single plants were selected and used to establish F4.5 progeny rows during the 2011 short rain season at Kabete. These progenies were evaluated for resistance to angular leaf spot, anthracnose, root rots, and agronomic traits. In 2012, 102 F4.6 lines were evaluated under drought stress and no‐stress conditions at Kabete and Thika. During the 2012 short rain season, selected disease and drought‐tolerant F4.7 lines were evaluated for mineral density and for their agronomic potential at four locations representing major bean production environments. Results showed significant (p < 0.01) variation for mineral density, drought tolerance, disease resistance, growth habit, grain type, and maturity among the populations and their progenies. Iron concentration varied from 30 to 130 ppm. Zinc concentration varied from 10 to 60 ppm. Superior lines were selected from BF01, BF07, BF16, and BF36 populations. Eighty‐four lines had 50% more yield under stress and no‐stress conditions compared with the parental lines, suggesting transgressive segregation. Results indicate that varieties combining high micronutrient density, resistance to diseases and drought, and marketable grain types can be developed from these populations.
topic bean
biofortification
disease resistance
drought tolerance
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.173
work_keys_str_mv AT paulmkimani breedingsecondgenerationbiofortifiedbeanvarietiesforafrica
AT ahmedwarsame breedingsecondgenerationbiofortifiedbeanvarietiesforafrica
_version_ 1721375454503370752