Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland

Rehabilitation of marine turtles in Queensland has multifaceted objectives. It treats individual animals, serves to educate the public, and contributes to conservation. We examined the outcome from rehabilitation, time in rehabilitation, and subsequent recapture and restranding rates of stranded mar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaylene Flint, Mark Flint, Colin James Limpus, Paul Mills
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3132.pdf
id doaj-0291d5a7b0f34ac48f69d0cbc245268d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0291d5a7b0f34ac48f69d0cbc245268d2020-11-25T01:43:17ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-03-015e313210.7717/peerj.3132Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in QueenslandJaylene Flint0Mark Flint1Colin James Limpus2Paul Mills3Veterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, AustraliaVeterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, AustraliaVeterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, AustraliaVeterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, AustraliaRehabilitation of marine turtles in Queensland has multifaceted objectives. It treats individual animals, serves to educate the public, and contributes to conservation. We examined the outcome from rehabilitation, time in rehabilitation, and subsequent recapture and restranding rates of stranded marine turtles between 1996 and 2013 to determine if the benefits associated with this practice are cost-effective as a conservation tool. Of 13,854 marine turtles reported as stranded during this 18-year period, 5,022 of these turtles were stranded alive with the remainder verified as dead or of unknown condition. A total of 2,970 (59%) of these live strandings were transported to a rehabilitation facility. Overall, 1,173/2,970 (39%) turtles were released over 18 years, 101 of which were recaptured: 77 reported as restrandings (20 dead, 13 alive subsequently died, 11 alive subsequently euthanized, 33 alive) and 24 recaptured during normal marine turtle population monitoring or fishing activities. Of the turtles admitted to rehabilitation exhibiting signs of disease, 88% of them died, either unassisted or by euthanasia and 66% of turtles admitted for unknown causes of stranding died either unassisted or by euthanasia. All turtles recorded as having a buoyancy disorder with no other presenting problem or disorder recorded, were released alive. In Queensland, rehabilitation costs approximately $1,000 per animal per year admitted to a center, $2,583 per animal per year released, and $123,750 per animal per year for marine turtles which are presumably successfully returned to the functional population. This practice may not be economically viable in its present configuration, but may be more cost effective as a mobile response unit. Further there is certainly benefit giving individual turtles a chance at survival and educating the public in the perils facing marine turtles. As well, rehabilitation can provide insight into the diseases and environmental stressors causing stranding, arming researchers with information to mitigate negative impacts.https://peerj.com/articles/3132.pdfSea turtleRehabilitationStrandingQueenslandMarine turtle
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaylene Flint
Mark Flint
Colin James Limpus
Paul Mills
spellingShingle Jaylene Flint
Mark Flint
Colin James Limpus
Paul Mills
Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
PeerJ
Sea turtle
Rehabilitation
Stranding
Queensland
Marine turtle
author_facet Jaylene Flint
Mark Flint
Colin James Limpus
Paul Mills
author_sort Jaylene Flint
title Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
title_short Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
title_full Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
title_fullStr Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
title_full_unstemmed Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland
title_sort status of marine turtle rehabilitation in queensland
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Rehabilitation of marine turtles in Queensland has multifaceted objectives. It treats individual animals, serves to educate the public, and contributes to conservation. We examined the outcome from rehabilitation, time in rehabilitation, and subsequent recapture and restranding rates of stranded marine turtles between 1996 and 2013 to determine if the benefits associated with this practice are cost-effective as a conservation tool. Of 13,854 marine turtles reported as stranded during this 18-year period, 5,022 of these turtles were stranded alive with the remainder verified as dead or of unknown condition. A total of 2,970 (59%) of these live strandings were transported to a rehabilitation facility. Overall, 1,173/2,970 (39%) turtles were released over 18 years, 101 of which were recaptured: 77 reported as restrandings (20 dead, 13 alive subsequently died, 11 alive subsequently euthanized, 33 alive) and 24 recaptured during normal marine turtle population monitoring or fishing activities. Of the turtles admitted to rehabilitation exhibiting signs of disease, 88% of them died, either unassisted or by euthanasia and 66% of turtles admitted for unknown causes of stranding died either unassisted or by euthanasia. All turtles recorded as having a buoyancy disorder with no other presenting problem or disorder recorded, were released alive. In Queensland, rehabilitation costs approximately $1,000 per animal per year admitted to a center, $2,583 per animal per year released, and $123,750 per animal per year for marine turtles which are presumably successfully returned to the functional population. This practice may not be economically viable in its present configuration, but may be more cost effective as a mobile response unit. Further there is certainly benefit giving individual turtles a chance at survival and educating the public in the perils facing marine turtles. As well, rehabilitation can provide insight into the diseases and environmental stressors causing stranding, arming researchers with information to mitigate negative impacts.
topic Sea turtle
Rehabilitation
Stranding
Queensland
Marine turtle
url https://peerj.com/articles/3132.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jayleneflint statusofmarineturtlerehabilitationinqueensland
AT markflint statusofmarineturtlerehabilitationinqueensland
AT colinjameslimpus statusofmarineturtlerehabilitationinqueensland
AT paulmills statusofmarineturtlerehabilitationinqueensland
_version_ 1725032301335674880