Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)

The family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridiz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Gomes, Cleusa Nagamachi, L Rodrigues, Solange Farias, J Rissino, Julio Pieczarka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2012-05-01
Series:Comparative Cytogenetics
Online Access:http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1749
id doaj-027ab43f1970470dbc5fe62e24a64087
record_format Article
spelling doaj-027ab43f1970470dbc5fe62e24a640872020-11-24T21:55:19ZengPensoft PublishersComparative Cytogenetics1993-07711993-078X2012-05-016221322510.3897/compcytogen.v6i2.16791749Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)A GomesCleusa NagamachiL RodriguesSolange FariasJ RissinoJulio PieczarkaThe family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for representatives of Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 collected in four states of Brazil (Amazonas, Bahia, Mato Grosso and Pará). Two karyomorphs were found in this species: 2n=34, FN=64 in populations from western Pará and Mato Grosso states and 2n=34, FN=62 from Amazonas, Bahia, and northeastern Pará and Marajó Island (northern). Difference in the Fundamental Number is determined by variation in the size of the Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) accompanied with heterochromatin on chromosomes of pair 16 or, alternatively, a pericentric inversion. The C-banding technique detected constitutive heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes and on the distal part of the long arm of pair 15 of specimens from all localities. FISH with a DNA telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sequence, and an 18S rDNA probe and silver staining revealed the presence of NOR in the long arm of the pair 15, associated with heterochromatin, and in the short arm of the pair 16 for all specimens. The intra-specific analysis using chromosome banding did not show any significant difference between the samples. The comparative analyses using G-banding have shown that nearly all chromosomes of R. pumilio were conserved in the chromosome complements of Glossophaga soricina Pallas, 1766, Phyllostomus hastatus Pallas, 1767, Phyllostomus discolor Wagner, 1843 and Mimon crenulatum Geoffroy, 1801, with a single chromosomal pair unique to R. pumilio (pair 15). However, two chromosomes of M. crenulatum are polymorphic for two independent pericentric inversions. The karyotype with 2n=34, NF=62 is probably the ancestral one for the other karyotypes described for R. pumilio.http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1749
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A Gomes
Cleusa Nagamachi
L Rodrigues
Solange Farias
J Rissino
Julio Pieczarka
spellingShingle A Gomes
Cleusa Nagamachi
L Rodrigues
Solange Farias
J Rissino
Julio Pieczarka
Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
Comparative Cytogenetics
author_facet A Gomes
Cleusa Nagamachi
L Rodrigues
Solange Farias
J Rissino
Julio Pieczarka
author_sort A Gomes
title Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_short Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_full Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_fullStr Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_full_unstemmed Karyotypic variation in Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)
title_sort karyotypic variation in rhinophylla pumilio peters, 1865 and comparative analysis with representatives of two subfamilies of phyllostomidae (chiroptera)
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Comparative Cytogenetics
issn 1993-0771
1993-078X
publishDate 2012-05-01
description The family Phyllostomidae belongs to the most abundant and diverse group of bats in the Neotropics with more morphological traits variation at the family level than any other group within mammals. In this work, we present data of chromosome banding (G, C and Ag-NOR) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for representatives of Rhinophylla pumilio Peters, 1865 collected in four states of Brazil (Amazonas, Bahia, Mato Grosso and Pará). Two karyomorphs were found in this species: 2n=34, FN=64 in populations from western Pará and Mato Grosso states and 2n=34, FN=62 from Amazonas, Bahia, and northeastern Pará and Marajó Island (northern). Difference in the Fundamental Number is determined by variation in the size of the Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) accompanied with heterochromatin on chromosomes of pair 16 or, alternatively, a pericentric inversion. The C-banding technique detected constitutive heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes and on the distal part of the long arm of pair 15 of specimens from all localities. FISH with a DNA telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sequence, and an 18S rDNA probe and silver staining revealed the presence of NOR in the long arm of the pair 15, associated with heterochromatin, and in the short arm of the pair 16 for all specimens. The intra-specific analysis using chromosome banding did not show any significant difference between the samples. The comparative analyses using G-banding have shown that nearly all chromosomes of R. pumilio were conserved in the chromosome complements of Glossophaga soricina Pallas, 1766, Phyllostomus hastatus Pallas, 1767, Phyllostomus discolor Wagner, 1843 and Mimon crenulatum Geoffroy, 1801, with a single chromosomal pair unique to R. pumilio (pair 15). However, two chromosomes of M. crenulatum are polymorphic for two independent pericentric inversions. The karyotype with 2n=34, NF=62 is probably the ancestral one for the other karyotypes described for R. pumilio.
url http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1749
work_keys_str_mv AT agomes karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT cleusanagamachi karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT lrodrigues karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT solangefarias karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT jrissino karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
AT juliopieczarka karyotypicvariationinrhinophyllapumiliopeters1865andcomparativeanalysiswithrepresentativesoftwosubfamiliesofphyllostomidaechiroptera
_version_ 1725863469588152320