Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys

With its popularity has come an unresolved issue about social capital: is it an individual or a collective property, or both? Many researchers take it for granted that social capital is collective, but most social surveys implicitly measure social capital at the individual level. After reviewing the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keming Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Survey Research Association 2007-01-01
Series:Survey Research Methods
Online Access:https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/48
id doaj-0265915ad1b14febad0f4b48e85e9ed2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0265915ad1b14febad0f4b48e85e9ed22020-11-25T02:02:22ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33611864-33612007-01-0111192710.18148/srm/2007.v1i1.4868Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social SurveysKeming YangWith its popularity has come an unresolved issue about social capital: is it an individual or a collective property, or both? Many researchers take it for granted that social capital is collective, but most social surveys implicitly measure social capital at the individual level. After reviewing the definitions by Bourdieu, Coleman, and Putnam, I become to agree with Portes that social capital can be an individual asset and should be firstly analyzed as such; if social capital is to be analyzed as a collective property, then the analysis should explicitly draw on a clear definition of individual social capital. I thus define individual social capital as the features of social groups or networks that each individual member can access and use for obtaining further benefits. Four types of features are identified (basic, specific, generalized, and structural), and example formulations of survey questions are proposed. Following this approach, I then assess some survey questions organized under five themes commonly found in social surveys for measuring social capital: participation in organizations, social networks, trust, civic participation, and perceptions of local area. I conclude that most of these themes and questions only weakly or indirectly measure individual social capital; therefore, they should be strengthened with the conceptual framework proposed in this paper and complemented with the items used in independent surveys on social networks.https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/48
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keming Yang
spellingShingle Keming Yang
Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
Survey Research Methods
author_facet Keming Yang
author_sort Keming Yang
title Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
title_short Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
title_full Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
title_fullStr Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys
title_sort individual social capital and its measurement in social surveys
publisher European Survey Research Association
series Survey Research Methods
issn 1864-3361
1864-3361
publishDate 2007-01-01
description With its popularity has come an unresolved issue about social capital: is it an individual or a collective property, or both? Many researchers take it for granted that social capital is collective, but most social surveys implicitly measure social capital at the individual level. After reviewing the definitions by Bourdieu, Coleman, and Putnam, I become to agree with Portes that social capital can be an individual asset and should be firstly analyzed as such; if social capital is to be analyzed as a collective property, then the analysis should explicitly draw on a clear definition of individual social capital. I thus define individual social capital as the features of social groups or networks that each individual member can access and use for obtaining further benefits. Four types of features are identified (basic, specific, generalized, and structural), and example formulations of survey questions are proposed. Following this approach, I then assess some survey questions organized under five themes commonly found in social surveys for measuring social capital: participation in organizations, social networks, trust, civic participation, and perceptions of local area. I conclude that most of these themes and questions only weakly or indirectly measure individual social capital; therefore, they should be strengthened with the conceptual framework proposed in this paper and complemented with the items used in independent surveys on social networks.
url https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/48
work_keys_str_mv AT kemingyang individualsocialcapitalanditsmeasurementinsocialsurveys
_version_ 1724953354717626368