The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study

Abstract Background Population health (PH) research capacity and performance are essential pillars of evidence-based practice to help address health inequalities. Best evidence is provided by systematic reviews (SRs). None of the published bibliometric analysis specifically assess the production of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karima Chaabna, Sohaila Cheema, Amit Abraham, Patrick Maisonneuve, Albert B. Lowenfels, Ravinder Mamtani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01552-x
id doaj-025dba49e64547b89b3237188e1d6857
record_format Article
spelling doaj-025dba49e64547b89b3237188e1d68572021-01-03T12:05:08ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532021-01-0110111210.1186/s13643-020-01552-xThe state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research studyKarima Chaabna0Sohaila Cheema1Amit Abraham2Patrick Maisonneuve3Albert B. Lowenfels4Ravinder Mamtani5Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine—QatarInstitute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine—QatarInstitute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine—QatarDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCSDepartment of Surgery and Department of Family Medicine, New York Medical CollegeInstitute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine—QatarAbstract Background Population health (PH) research capacity and performance are essential pillars of evidence-based practice to help address health inequalities. Best evidence is provided by systematic reviews (SRs). None of the published bibliometric analysis specifically assess the production of SRs on PH in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The aim of our study is to investigate publication patterns and time trends of SRs reporting PH in the MENA region to evaluate the state of PH research performance in the region. Method The study protocol was developed a priori (protocol registration number: CRD42017076736). PubMed was searched. Two independent reviewers screened 5747 identified articles. We investigated author affiliation and collaboration, yearly citations of the SRs and journal information. Joinpoint regression was used to explore these characteristics overtime. Results Our meta-research included 387 SRs published between 2008 and 2016 which reported data on PH in 20 MENA countries. Publication of SRs increased over time in journals with impact factor < 4 and in the categories of yearly number of citations < 50 (p values ≤ 0.0024). Authors belonging to the region published increasingly (p value = 0.0001) over time. Thirty percent of the SRs were from authors solely from the region, while an additional 30% were from the region collaborating with Western country authors. Of these collaborative reviews, 79% were led by authors from the region. However, collaboration in the region (with the exclusion of collaboration with Western country authors) was rare (0.8%). These authors from the region published more in open-access journals while authors from Western countries collaborating or not with authors from the region published more in hybrid or non-open-access journals (p value < 0.0001). Collaboration between authors from MENA and Western countries led to published SRs in journals with impact factor ≥ 10. Systematic reviews with global coverage were published more by authors from Western countries, while SRs with country-level coverage were published by authors from the region (p value < 0.0001). Conclusion The incremental trend of PH SR publications on MENA likely reflects the ongoing improvement in research performance in the region. Authors from the region appear to be taking a lead role in conducting and disseminating MENA PH research. Open-access journals are a major contributor in facilitating MENA research dissemination. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42017076736https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01552-xResearch capacityMiddle East and North AfricaGulf Cooperation CouncilPopulation healthNorth AfricaMiddle East
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karima Chaabna
Sohaila Cheema
Amit Abraham
Patrick Maisonneuve
Albert B. Lowenfels
Ravinder Mamtani
spellingShingle Karima Chaabna
Sohaila Cheema
Amit Abraham
Patrick Maisonneuve
Albert B. Lowenfels
Ravinder Mamtani
The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
Systematic Reviews
Research capacity
Middle East and North Africa
Gulf Cooperation Council
Population health
North Africa
Middle East
author_facet Karima Chaabna
Sohaila Cheema
Amit Abraham
Patrick Maisonneuve
Albert B. Lowenfels
Ravinder Mamtani
author_sort Karima Chaabna
title The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
title_short The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
title_full The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
title_fullStr The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
title_full_unstemmed The state of population health research performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a meta-research study
title_sort state of population health research performance in the middle east and north africa: a meta-research study
publisher BMC
series Systematic Reviews
issn 2046-4053
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background Population health (PH) research capacity and performance are essential pillars of evidence-based practice to help address health inequalities. Best evidence is provided by systematic reviews (SRs). None of the published bibliometric analysis specifically assess the production of SRs on PH in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The aim of our study is to investigate publication patterns and time trends of SRs reporting PH in the MENA region to evaluate the state of PH research performance in the region. Method The study protocol was developed a priori (protocol registration number: CRD42017076736). PubMed was searched. Two independent reviewers screened 5747 identified articles. We investigated author affiliation and collaboration, yearly citations of the SRs and journal information. Joinpoint regression was used to explore these characteristics overtime. Results Our meta-research included 387 SRs published between 2008 and 2016 which reported data on PH in 20 MENA countries. Publication of SRs increased over time in journals with impact factor < 4 and in the categories of yearly number of citations < 50 (p values ≤ 0.0024). Authors belonging to the region published increasingly (p value = 0.0001) over time. Thirty percent of the SRs were from authors solely from the region, while an additional 30% were from the region collaborating with Western country authors. Of these collaborative reviews, 79% were led by authors from the region. However, collaboration in the region (with the exclusion of collaboration with Western country authors) was rare (0.8%). These authors from the region published more in open-access journals while authors from Western countries collaborating or not with authors from the region published more in hybrid or non-open-access journals (p value < 0.0001). Collaboration between authors from MENA and Western countries led to published SRs in journals with impact factor ≥ 10. Systematic reviews with global coverage were published more by authors from Western countries, while SRs with country-level coverage were published by authors from the region (p value < 0.0001). Conclusion The incremental trend of PH SR publications on MENA likely reflects the ongoing improvement in research performance in the region. Authors from the region appear to be taking a lead role in conducting and disseminating MENA PH research. Open-access journals are a major contributor in facilitating MENA research dissemination. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42017076736
topic Research capacity
Middle East and North Africa
Gulf Cooperation Council
Population health
North Africa
Middle East
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01552-x
work_keys_str_mv AT karimachaabna thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT sohailacheema thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT amitabraham thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT patrickmaisonneuve thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT albertblowenfels thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT ravindermamtani thestateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT karimachaabna stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT sohailacheema stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT amitabraham stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT patrickmaisonneuve stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT albertblowenfels stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
AT ravindermamtani stateofpopulationhealthresearchperformanceinthemiddleeastandnorthafricaametaresearchstudy
_version_ 1724350810522910720