Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites
Imaging satellite scheduling is an NP-hard problem with many complex constraints. This paper researches the scheduling problem for dynamic tasks oriented to some emergency cases. After the dynamic properties of satellite scheduling were analyzed, the optimization model is proposed in this paper. Bas...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/234928 |
id |
doaj-0254d5a04002441d9625806a890c5531 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0254d5a04002441d9625806a890c55312020-11-24T23:38:39ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472014-01-01201410.1155/2014/234928234928Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging SatellitesMaocai Wang0Guangming Dai1Massimiliano Vasile2School of Computer, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, ChinaSchool of Computer, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, ChinaDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UKImaging satellite scheduling is an NP-hard problem with many complex constraints. This paper researches the scheduling problem for dynamic tasks oriented to some emergency cases. After the dynamic properties of satellite scheduling were analyzed, the optimization model is proposed in this paper. Based on the model, two heuristic algorithms are proposed to solve the problem. The first heuristic algorithm arranges new tasks by inserting or deleting them, then inserting them repeatedly according to the priority from low to high, which is named IDI algorithm. The second one called ISDR adopts four steps: insert directly, insert by shifting, insert by deleting, and reinsert the tasks deleted. Moreover, two heuristic factors, congestion degree of a time window and the overlapping degree of a task, are employed to improve the algorithm’s performance. Finally, a case is given to test the algorithms. The results show that the IDI algorithm is better than ISDR from the running time point of view while ISDR algorithm with heuristic factors is more effective with regard to algorithm performance. Moreover, the results also show that our method has good performance for the larger size of the dynamic tasks in comparison with the other two methods.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/234928 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maocai Wang Guangming Dai Massimiliano Vasile |
spellingShingle |
Maocai Wang Guangming Dai Massimiliano Vasile Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
author_facet |
Maocai Wang Guangming Dai Massimiliano Vasile |
author_sort |
Maocai Wang |
title |
Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites |
title_short |
Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites |
title_full |
Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites |
title_fullStr |
Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heuristic Scheduling Algorithm Oriented Dynamic Tasks for Imaging Satellites |
title_sort |
heuristic scheduling algorithm oriented dynamic tasks for imaging satellites |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
issn |
1024-123X 1563-5147 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Imaging satellite scheduling is an NP-hard problem with many complex constraints. This paper researches the scheduling problem for dynamic tasks oriented to some emergency cases. After the dynamic properties of satellite scheduling were analyzed, the optimization model is proposed in this paper. Based on the model, two heuristic algorithms are proposed to solve the problem. The first heuristic algorithm arranges new tasks by inserting or deleting them, then inserting them repeatedly according to the priority from low to high, which is named IDI algorithm. The second one called ISDR adopts four steps: insert directly, insert by shifting, insert by deleting, and reinsert the tasks deleted. Moreover, two heuristic factors, congestion degree of a time window and the overlapping degree of a task, are employed to improve the algorithm’s performance. Finally, a case is given to test the algorithms. The results show that the IDI algorithm is better than ISDR from the running time point of view while ISDR algorithm with heuristic factors is more effective with regard to algorithm performance. Moreover, the results also show that our method has good performance for the larger size of the dynamic tasks in comparison with the other two methods. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/234928 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maocaiwang heuristicschedulingalgorithmorienteddynamictasksforimagingsatellites AT guangmingdai heuristicschedulingalgorithmorienteddynamictasksforimagingsatellites AT massimilianovasile heuristicschedulingalgorithmorienteddynamictasksforimagingsatellites |
_version_ |
1725516343063609344 |