The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
This study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors dur...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267 |
id |
doaj-023d916b854b4c7ba1f03f6f41dbd56a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-023d916b854b4c7ba1f03f6f41dbd56a2020-11-24T21:50:10ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-01-0112226710.3390/en12020267en12020267The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth PerformanceXiping Wang0Moyang Li1Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 619, Yonghua North Street, Baoding 071003, ChinaDepartment of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 619, Yonghua North Street, Baoding 071003, ChinaThis study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors during 2000–2014. Then, considering the space–time characteristics in IGGP, the spatial spillover effects of three types of ER, namely, administrative environmental regulation (AER), market-based environmental regulation (MER), and voluntary environmental regulation (VER), on IGGP was examined by employing spatial Durbin model (SDM). The main findings are: (1) the IGGP is low but shows a trend of continuous improvement and there is a significant disparity and spatial autocorrelations amongst regions; (2) the spillover effects of the three types of ER are different, specifically, the spillover effects of AER are significant negative, while the effects of MER and VER are both significant positive. The difference between the latter two is that the positive spillover effect of MER on IGGP is so large to outperform the negative direct effect, while the effect of VER is very minor. Based on these findings, relevant policy suggestions are presented to balance industrial economic and environmental protection in order to promote IGGP.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267industrial green growth performanceenvironmental regulationspatial spilloverspatial Durbin model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xiping Wang Moyang Li |
spellingShingle |
Xiping Wang Moyang Li The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance Energies industrial green growth performance environmental regulation spatial spillover spatial Durbin model |
author_facet |
Xiping Wang Moyang Li |
author_sort |
Xiping Wang |
title |
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance |
title_short |
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance |
title_full |
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance |
title_fullStr |
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance |
title_sort |
spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on china’s industrial green growth performance |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors during 2000–2014. Then, considering the space–time characteristics in IGGP, the spatial spillover effects of three types of ER, namely, administrative environmental regulation (AER), market-based environmental regulation (MER), and voluntary environmental regulation (VER), on IGGP was examined by employing spatial Durbin model (SDM). The main findings are: (1) the IGGP is low but shows a trend of continuous improvement and there is a significant disparity and spatial autocorrelations amongst regions; (2) the spillover effects of the three types of ER are different, specifically, the spillover effects of AER are significant negative, while the effects of MER and VER are both significant positive. The difference between the latter two is that the positive spillover effect of MER on IGGP is so large to outperform the negative direct effect, while the effect of VER is very minor. Based on these findings, relevant policy suggestions are presented to balance industrial economic and environmental protection in order to promote IGGP. |
topic |
industrial green growth performance environmental regulation spatial spillover spatial Durbin model |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xipingwang thespatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance AT moyangli thespatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance AT xipingwang spatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance AT moyangli spatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance |
_version_ |
1725884913613275136 |