The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance

This study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors dur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiping Wang, Moyang Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267
id doaj-023d916b854b4c7ba1f03f6f41dbd56a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-023d916b854b4c7ba1f03f6f41dbd56a2020-11-24T21:50:10ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-01-0112226710.3390/en12020267en12020267The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth PerformanceXiping Wang0Moyang Li1Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 619, Yonghua North Street, Baoding 071003, ChinaDepartment of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, No. 619, Yonghua North Street, Baoding 071003, ChinaThis study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors during 2000–2014. Then, considering the space–time characteristics in IGGP, the spatial spillover effects of three types of ER, namely, administrative environmental regulation (AER), market-based environmental regulation (MER), and voluntary environmental regulation (VER), on IGGP was examined by employing spatial Durbin model (SDM). The main findings are: (1) the IGGP is low but shows a trend of continuous improvement and there is a significant disparity and spatial autocorrelations amongst regions; (2) the spillover effects of the three types of ER are different, specifically, the spillover effects of AER are significant negative, while the effects of MER and VER are both significant positive. The difference between the latter two is that the positive spillover effect of MER on IGGP is so large to outperform the negative direct effect, while the effect of VER is very minor. Based on these findings, relevant policy suggestions are presented to balance industrial economic and environmental protection in order to promote IGGP.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267industrial green growth performanceenvironmental regulationspatial spilloverspatial Durbin model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiping Wang
Moyang Li
spellingShingle Xiping Wang
Moyang Li
The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
Energies
industrial green growth performance
environmental regulation
spatial spillover
spatial Durbin model
author_facet Xiping Wang
Moyang Li
author_sort Xiping Wang
title The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
title_short The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
title_full The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
title_fullStr The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Spatial Spillover Effects of Environmental Regulation on China’s Industrial Green Growth Performance
title_sort spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on china’s industrial green growth performance
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This study investigated the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation (ER) on industrial green growth performance (IGGP) in China. Firstly, a parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was estimated to measure IGGP using the data of China’s 30 provincial industry sectors during 2000–2014. Then, considering the space–time characteristics in IGGP, the spatial spillover effects of three types of ER, namely, administrative environmental regulation (AER), market-based environmental regulation (MER), and voluntary environmental regulation (VER), on IGGP was examined by employing spatial Durbin model (SDM). The main findings are: (1) the IGGP is low but shows a trend of continuous improvement and there is a significant disparity and spatial autocorrelations amongst regions; (2) the spillover effects of the three types of ER are different, specifically, the spillover effects of AER are significant negative, while the effects of MER and VER are both significant positive. The difference between the latter two is that the positive spillover effect of MER on IGGP is so large to outperform the negative direct effect, while the effect of VER is very minor. Based on these findings, relevant policy suggestions are presented to balance industrial economic and environmental protection in order to promote IGGP.
topic industrial green growth performance
environmental regulation
spatial spillover
spatial Durbin model
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/267
work_keys_str_mv AT xipingwang thespatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance
AT moyangli thespatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance
AT xipingwang spatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance
AT moyangli spatialspillovereffectsofenvironmentalregulationonchinasindustrialgreengrowthperformance
_version_ 1725884913613275136