FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.

Behavioural evidence suggests that English regular past tense forms are automatically decomposed into their stem and affix (played  = play+ed) based on an implicit linguistic rule, which does not apply to the idiosyncratically formed irregular forms (kept). Additionally, regular, but not irregular i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christos Pliatsikas, Tom Johnstone, Theodoros Marinis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4018348?pdf=render
id doaj-02364f7a4b06483c8999959aa12f17d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02364f7a4b06483c8999959aa12f17d42020-11-25T02:33:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9729810.1371/journal.pone.0097298FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.Christos PliatsikasTom JohnstoneTheodoros MarinisBehavioural evidence suggests that English regular past tense forms are automatically decomposed into their stem and affix (played  = play+ed) based on an implicit linguistic rule, which does not apply to the idiosyncratically formed irregular forms (kept). Additionally, regular, but not irregular inflections, are thought to be processed through the procedural memory system (left inferior frontal gyrus, basal ganglia, cerebellum). It has been suggested that this distinction does not to apply to second language (L2) learners of English; however, this has not been tested at the brain level. This fMRI study used a masked-priming task with regular and irregular prime-target pairs (played-play/kept-keep) to investigate morphological processing in native and highly proficient late L2 English speakers. No between-groups differences were revealed. Compared to irregular pairs, regular pairs activated the pars opercularis, bilateral caudate nucleus and the right cerebellum, which are part of the procedural memory network and have been connected with the processing of morphologically complex forms. Our study is the first to provide evidence for native-like involvement of the procedural memory system in processing of regular past tense by late L2 learners of English.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4018348?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christos Pliatsikas
Tom Johnstone
Theodoros Marinis
spellingShingle Christos Pliatsikas
Tom Johnstone
Theodoros Marinis
FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Christos Pliatsikas
Tom Johnstone
Theodoros Marinis
author_sort Christos Pliatsikas
title FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
title_short FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
title_full FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
title_fullStr FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
title_full_unstemmed FMRI evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
title_sort fmri evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system in morphological processing of a second language.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Behavioural evidence suggests that English regular past tense forms are automatically decomposed into their stem and affix (played  = play+ed) based on an implicit linguistic rule, which does not apply to the idiosyncratically formed irregular forms (kept). Additionally, regular, but not irregular inflections, are thought to be processed through the procedural memory system (left inferior frontal gyrus, basal ganglia, cerebellum). It has been suggested that this distinction does not to apply to second language (L2) learners of English; however, this has not been tested at the brain level. This fMRI study used a masked-priming task with regular and irregular prime-target pairs (played-play/kept-keep) to investigate morphological processing in native and highly proficient late L2 English speakers. No between-groups differences were revealed. Compared to irregular pairs, regular pairs activated the pars opercularis, bilateral caudate nucleus and the right cerebellum, which are part of the procedural memory network and have been connected with the processing of morphologically complex forms. Our study is the first to provide evidence for native-like involvement of the procedural memory system in processing of regular past tense by late L2 learners of English.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4018348?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT christospliatsikas fmrievidencefortheinvolvementoftheproceduralmemorysysteminmorphologicalprocessingofasecondlanguage
AT tomjohnstone fmrievidencefortheinvolvementoftheproceduralmemorysysteminmorphologicalprocessingofasecondlanguage
AT theodorosmarinis fmrievidencefortheinvolvementoftheproceduralmemorysysteminmorphologicalprocessingofasecondlanguage
_version_ 1724814642489851904