Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with iso...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Patient Experience |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356 |
id |
doaj-022ad4acf9fc46df9c97e6d3c0e19600 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-022ad4acf9fc46df9c97e6d3c0e196002021-04-19T22:03:41ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37432021-04-01810.1177/23743735211007356Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional StudyVincenzo G Menditto MD0Antonello Maraldo LLM1Pamela Barbadoro MD2Roberto Maccaroni BSN3Aldo Salvi MD4Marcello M D’Errico MD5Stefano Marasca PhD6 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy General Direction Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Biomedical Science and Public Health, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Biomedical Science and Public Health, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy Management Department, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, ItalyBackground: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with isolated trauma of the limbs receiving emergency department (ED) care. Methods: A survey was performed in the ED using a questionnaire among the enrolled patients to identify which proposed outcomes were perceived as important by the patients according to their expectations. Results: Ninety-six consecutive patients were conveniently enrolled. For each item of the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who agreed to perceive it important were calculated. Three items were perceived important by almost 85% of the patients: getting an x-ray (91%; 95% CI: 88%-98%), obtaining a written therapy (94%; 95% CI: 87%-97%), and feeling the physicians’ and nurses’ empathy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). The ED system was able to satisfy 2 of the 3 agreed PROs in at least 85% of the cases: getting an x-ray (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%) and obtaining a written therapy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). Moreover, in 30/96 patients (31%; 95% CI: 22%-41%), all the PROs were satisfied, and in 75/96 patients (78%; 95% CI: 69%-85%), all agreed PROs were satisfied. Conclusions: Our study shows an example of core of PROs proposed by the ED physicians and agreed by the patients. Moreover, we presented a set of PROMs which could be used to measure the quality of an ED.https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vincenzo G Menditto MD Antonello Maraldo LLM Pamela Barbadoro MD Roberto Maccaroni BSN Aldo Salvi MD Marcello M D’Errico MD Stefano Marasca PhD |
spellingShingle |
Vincenzo G Menditto MD Antonello Maraldo LLM Pamela Barbadoro MD Roberto Maccaroni BSN Aldo Salvi MD Marcello M D’Errico MD Stefano Marasca PhD Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study Journal of Patient Experience |
author_facet |
Vincenzo G Menditto MD Antonello Maraldo LLM Pamela Barbadoro MD Roberto Maccaroni BSN Aldo Salvi MD Marcello M D’Errico MD Stefano Marasca PhD |
author_sort |
Vincenzo G Menditto MD |
title |
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short |
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full |
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort |
patient-reported outcome measurements (proms) after discharge from the emergency department: a cross-sectional study |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Patient Experience |
issn |
2374-3743 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Background: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with isolated trauma of the limbs receiving emergency department (ED) care. Methods: A survey was performed in the ED using a questionnaire among the enrolled patients to identify which proposed outcomes were perceived as important by the patients according to their expectations. Results: Ninety-six consecutive patients were conveniently enrolled. For each item of the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who agreed to perceive it important were calculated. Three items were perceived important by almost 85% of the patients: getting an x-ray (91%; 95% CI: 88%-98%), obtaining a written therapy (94%; 95% CI: 87%-97%), and feeling the physicians’ and nurses’ empathy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). The ED system was able to satisfy 2 of the 3 agreed PROs in at least 85% of the cases: getting an x-ray (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%) and obtaining a written therapy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). Moreover, in 30/96 patients (31%; 95% CI: 22%-41%), all the PROs were satisfied, and in 75/96 patients (78%; 95% CI: 69%-85%), all agreed PROs were satisfied. Conclusions: Our study shows an example of core of PROs proposed by the ED physicians and agreed by the patients. Moreover, we presented a set of PROMs which could be used to measure the quality of an ED. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vincenzogmendittomd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT antonellomaraldollm patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT pamelabarbadoromd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT robertomaccaronibsn patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT aldosalvimd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT marcellomderricomd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy AT stefanomarascaphd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1721519021061308416 |