Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with iso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincenzo G Menditto MD, Antonello Maraldo LLM, Pamela Barbadoro MD, Roberto Maccaroni BSN, Aldo Salvi MD, Marcello M D’Errico MD, Stefano Marasca PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Patient Experience
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356
id doaj-022ad4acf9fc46df9c97e6d3c0e19600
record_format Article
spelling doaj-022ad4acf9fc46df9c97e6d3c0e196002021-04-19T22:03:41ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37432021-04-01810.1177/23743735211007356Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional StudyVincenzo G Menditto MD0Antonello Maraldo LLM1Pamela Barbadoro MD2Roberto Maccaroni BSN3Aldo Salvi MD4Marcello M D’Errico MD5Stefano Marasca PhD6 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy General Direction Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Biomedical Science and Public Health, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy Department of Biomedical Science and Public Health, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy Management Department, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, ItalyBackground: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with isolated trauma of the limbs receiving emergency department (ED) care. Methods: A survey was performed in the ED using a questionnaire among the enrolled patients to identify which proposed outcomes were perceived as important by the patients according to their expectations. Results: Ninety-six consecutive patients were conveniently enrolled. For each item of the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who agreed to perceive it important were calculated. Three items were perceived important by almost 85% of the patients: getting an x-ray (91%; 95% CI: 88%-98%), obtaining a written therapy (94%; 95% CI: 87%-97%), and feeling the physicians’ and nurses’ empathy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). The ED system was able to satisfy 2 of the 3 agreed PROs in at least 85% of the cases: getting an x-ray (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%) and obtaining a written therapy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). Moreover, in 30/96 patients (31%; 95% CI: 22%-41%), all the PROs were satisfied, and in 75/96 patients (78%; 95% CI: 69%-85%), all agreed PROs were satisfied. Conclusions: Our study shows an example of core of PROs proposed by the ED physicians and agreed by the patients. Moreover, we presented a set of PROMs which could be used to measure the quality of an ED.https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vincenzo G Menditto MD
Antonello Maraldo LLM
Pamela Barbadoro MD
Roberto Maccaroni BSN
Aldo Salvi MD
Marcello M D’Errico MD
Stefano Marasca PhD
spellingShingle Vincenzo G Menditto MD
Antonello Maraldo LLM
Pamela Barbadoro MD
Roberto Maccaroni BSN
Aldo Salvi MD
Marcello M D’Errico MD
Stefano Marasca PhD
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
Journal of Patient Experience
author_facet Vincenzo G Menditto MD
Antonello Maraldo LLM
Pamela Barbadoro MD
Roberto Maccaroni BSN
Aldo Salvi MD
Marcello M D’Errico MD
Stefano Marasca PhD
author_sort Vincenzo G Menditto MD
title Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort patient-reported outcome measurements (proms) after discharge from the emergency department: a cross-sectional study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Patient Experience
issn 2374-3743
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with isolated trauma of the limbs receiving emergency department (ED) care. Methods: A survey was performed in the ED using a questionnaire among the enrolled patients to identify which proposed outcomes were perceived as important by the patients according to their expectations. Results: Ninety-six consecutive patients were conveniently enrolled. For each item of the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who agreed to perceive it important were calculated. Three items were perceived important by almost 85% of the patients: getting an x-ray (91%; 95% CI: 88%-98%), obtaining a written therapy (94%; 95% CI: 87%-97%), and feeling the physicians’ and nurses’ empathy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). The ED system was able to satisfy 2 of the 3 agreed PROs in at least 85% of the cases: getting an x-ray (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%) and obtaining a written therapy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). Moreover, in 30/96 patients (31%; 95% CI: 22%-41%), all the PROs were satisfied, and in 75/96 patients (78%; 95% CI: 69%-85%), all agreed PROs were satisfied. Conclusions: Our study shows an example of core of PROs proposed by the ED physicians and agreed by the patients. Moreover, we presented a set of PROMs which could be used to measure the quality of an ED.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211007356
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzogmendittomd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT antonellomaraldollm patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT pamelabarbadoromd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT robertomaccaronibsn patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT aldosalvimd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT marcellomderricomd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT stefanomarascaphd patientreportedoutcomemeasurementspromsafterdischargefromtheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1721519021061308416