Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

<h4>Background</h4>Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evalua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruno A M P Besen, Marcelo Park, Otávio T Ranzani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072
id doaj-02294b7363b0442fad20396dcc790532
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02294b7363b0442fad20396dcc7905322021-06-26T04:31:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e024607210.1371/journal.pone.0246072Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Bruno A M P BesenMarcelo ParkOtávio T Ranzani<h4>Background</h4>Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evaluated whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) would be beneficial compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) regarding hospital mortality.<h4>Methods</h4>Multicenter cohort study of VOPs admitted with CAP in need of IMV or NIV to 11 Brazilian ICUs from 2009 through 2012. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the association between the initial ventilatory strategy (NIV vs. IMV) and hospital mortality adjusting for confounding factors. We evaluated effect modification with interaction terms in pre-specified sub-groups.<h4>Results</h4>Of 369 VOPs admitted for CAP with respiratory failure, 232 (63%) received NIV and 137 (37%) received IMV as initial ventilatory strategy. IMV patients were sicker at baseline (median SOFA 8 vs. 4). Hospital mortality was 114/232 (49%) for NIV and 90/137 (66%) for IMV. For the comparison NIV vs. IMV (reference), the crude odds ratio (OR) was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.33-0.78, p = 0.002). This association was largely confounded by antecedent characteristics and non-respiratory SOFA (adjOR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.41-1.20, p = 0.196). The fully adjusted model, additionally including Pao2/Fio2 ratio, pH and Paco2, yielded an adjOR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.46-1.41, p = 0.452). There was no strong evidence of effect modification among relevant subgroups, such as Pao2/Fio2 ratio ≤ 150 (p = 0.30), acute respiratory acidosis (p = 0.42) and non-respiratory SOFA ≥ 4 (p = 0.53).<h4>Conclusions</h4>NIV was not associated with lower hospital mortality when compared to IMV in critically ill VOP admitted with CAP, but there was no strong signal of harm from its use. The main confounders of this association were both the severity of respiratory dysfunction and of extra-respiratory organ failures.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bruno A M P Besen
Marcelo Park
Otávio T Ranzani
spellingShingle Bruno A M P Besen
Marcelo Park
Otávio T Ranzani
Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bruno A M P Besen
Marcelo Park
Otávio T Ranzani
author_sort Bruno A M P Besen
title Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
title_short Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
title_full Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
title_fullStr Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
title_sort noninvasive ventilation in critically ill very old patients with pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Very old patients (≥ 80 years-old, VOP) are increasingly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common reason for admission and the best strategy of support for respiratory failure in this scenario is not fully known. We evaluated whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) would be beneficial compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) regarding hospital mortality.<h4>Methods</h4>Multicenter cohort study of VOPs admitted with CAP in need of IMV or NIV to 11 Brazilian ICUs from 2009 through 2012. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the association between the initial ventilatory strategy (NIV vs. IMV) and hospital mortality adjusting for confounding factors. We evaluated effect modification with interaction terms in pre-specified sub-groups.<h4>Results</h4>Of 369 VOPs admitted for CAP with respiratory failure, 232 (63%) received NIV and 137 (37%) received IMV as initial ventilatory strategy. IMV patients were sicker at baseline (median SOFA 8 vs. 4). Hospital mortality was 114/232 (49%) for NIV and 90/137 (66%) for IMV. For the comparison NIV vs. IMV (reference), the crude odds ratio (OR) was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.33-0.78, p = 0.002). This association was largely confounded by antecedent characteristics and non-respiratory SOFA (adjOR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.41-1.20, p = 0.196). The fully adjusted model, additionally including Pao2/Fio2 ratio, pH and Paco2, yielded an adjOR of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.46-1.41, p = 0.452). There was no strong evidence of effect modification among relevant subgroups, such as Pao2/Fio2 ratio ≤ 150 (p = 0.30), acute respiratory acidosis (p = 0.42) and non-respiratory SOFA ≥ 4 (p = 0.53).<h4>Conclusions</h4>NIV was not associated with lower hospital mortality when compared to IMV in critically ill VOP admitted with CAP, but there was no strong signal of harm from its use. The main confounders of this association were both the severity of respiratory dysfunction and of extra-respiratory organ failures.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246072
work_keys_str_mv AT brunoampbesen noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT marcelopark noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT otaviotranzani noninvasiveventilationincriticallyillveryoldpatientswithpneumoniaamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1721359191686250496