Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy

Study objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shereef M. Zayed, Khaled A. Elsetohy, Mohamed Zayed, Usama M. Fouda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-09-01
Series:Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855
id doaj-0227b34e1cd6458985d61a0c51f237a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0227b34e1cd6458985d61a0c51f237a42020-11-25T01:46:10ZengSpringerOpenMiddle East Fertility Society Journal1110-56902015-09-0120315415810.1016/j.mefs.2014.08.003Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopyShereef M. ZayedKhaled A. ElsetohyMohamed ZayedUsama M. FoudaStudy objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients: Two hundred and fifty-four women. Intervention: Office hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methodology: Pain intensity was assessed at the end of procedure using visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to ten (intolerable pain). Results: Eighty-six patients (33.86%) reported no pain or mild discomfort (0–3 pain score), 118 patients (46.46%) reported moderate pain (4–7 pain score), 44 patients (17.32%) experienced severe pain (8–9 pain score) and 6 patients (2.36%) experienced intolerable pain (10 pain score) necessitating stoppage of the procedure. Bivariate analysis revealed that nulliparous patients had a higher risk of developing severe or intolerable pain compared with non-nulliparous patients (26.67% vs. 11.76%, P value = 0.003). Moreover, severe or intolerable pain was reported more frequently in patients with cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min (39.58% vs. 15.05%, P value = 0.0001 and 25.22% vs. 15.11%, P value = 0.044 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min were strongly associated with severe or intolerable pain (8–10 pain score). Conclusion: Nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min seem to be the main factors associated with severe or intolerable pain during office hysteroscopy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855PainOffice hysteroscopyPredictive factors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shereef M. Zayed
Khaled A. Elsetohy
Mohamed Zayed
Usama M. Fouda
spellingShingle Shereef M. Zayed
Khaled A. Elsetohy
Mohamed Zayed
Usama M. Fouda
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Pain
Office hysteroscopy
Predictive factors
author_facet Shereef M. Zayed
Khaled A. Elsetohy
Mohamed Zayed
Usama M. Fouda
author_sort Shereef M. Zayed
title Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
title_short Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
title_full Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
title_fullStr Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
title_sort factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
publisher SpringerOpen
series Middle East Fertility Society Journal
issn 1110-5690
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Study objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients: Two hundred and fifty-four women. Intervention: Office hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methodology: Pain intensity was assessed at the end of procedure using visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to ten (intolerable pain). Results: Eighty-six patients (33.86%) reported no pain or mild discomfort (0–3 pain score), 118 patients (46.46%) reported moderate pain (4–7 pain score), 44 patients (17.32%) experienced severe pain (8–9 pain score) and 6 patients (2.36%) experienced intolerable pain (10 pain score) necessitating stoppage of the procedure. Bivariate analysis revealed that nulliparous patients had a higher risk of developing severe or intolerable pain compared with non-nulliparous patients (26.67% vs. 11.76%, P value = 0.003). Moreover, severe or intolerable pain was reported more frequently in patients with cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min (39.58% vs. 15.05%, P value = 0.0001 and 25.22% vs. 15.11%, P value = 0.044 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min were strongly associated with severe or intolerable pain (8–10 pain score). Conclusion: Nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min seem to be the main factors associated with severe or intolerable pain during office hysteroscopy.
topic Pain
Office hysteroscopy
Predictive factors
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855
work_keys_str_mv AT shereefmzayed factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy
AT khaledaelsetohy factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy
AT mohamedzayed factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy
AT usamamfouda factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy
_version_ 1725020497097261056