Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy
Study objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients:...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Middle East Fertility Society Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855 |
id |
doaj-0227b34e1cd6458985d61a0c51f237a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0227b34e1cd6458985d61a0c51f237a42020-11-25T01:46:10ZengSpringerOpenMiddle East Fertility Society Journal1110-56902015-09-0120315415810.1016/j.mefs.2014.08.003Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopyShereef M. ZayedKhaled A. ElsetohyMohamed ZayedUsama M. FoudaStudy objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients: Two hundred and fifty-four women. Intervention: Office hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methodology: Pain intensity was assessed at the end of procedure using visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to ten (intolerable pain). Results: Eighty-six patients (33.86%) reported no pain or mild discomfort (0–3 pain score), 118 patients (46.46%) reported moderate pain (4–7 pain score), 44 patients (17.32%) experienced severe pain (8–9 pain score) and 6 patients (2.36%) experienced intolerable pain (10 pain score) necessitating stoppage of the procedure. Bivariate analysis revealed that nulliparous patients had a higher risk of developing severe or intolerable pain compared with non-nulliparous patients (26.67% vs. 11.76%, P value = 0.003). Moreover, severe or intolerable pain was reported more frequently in patients with cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min (39.58% vs. 15.05%, P value = 0.0001 and 25.22% vs. 15.11%, P value = 0.044 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min were strongly associated with severe or intolerable pain (8–10 pain score). Conclusion: Nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min seem to be the main factors associated with severe or intolerable pain during office hysteroscopy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855PainOffice hysteroscopyPredictive factors |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shereef M. Zayed Khaled A. Elsetohy Mohamed Zayed Usama M. Fouda |
spellingShingle |
Shereef M. Zayed Khaled A. Elsetohy Mohamed Zayed Usama M. Fouda Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy Middle East Fertility Society Journal Pain Office hysteroscopy Predictive factors |
author_facet |
Shereef M. Zayed Khaled A. Elsetohy Mohamed Zayed Usama M. Fouda |
author_sort |
Shereef M. Zayed |
title |
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
title_short |
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
title_full |
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
title_fullStr |
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
title_sort |
factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Middle East Fertility Society Journal |
issn |
1110-5690 |
publishDate |
2015-09-01 |
description |
Study objective: To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy.
Design: Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: University hospital.
Patients: Two hundred and fifty-four women.
Intervention: Office hysteroscopy without anesthesia.
Methodology: Pain intensity was assessed at the end of procedure using visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to ten (intolerable pain).
Results: Eighty-six patients (33.86%) reported no pain or mild discomfort (0–3 pain score), 118 patients (46.46%) reported moderate pain (4–7 pain score), 44 patients (17.32%) experienced severe pain (8–9 pain score) and 6 patients (2.36%) experienced intolerable pain (10 pain score) necessitating stoppage of the procedure. Bivariate analysis revealed that nulliparous patients had a higher risk of developing severe or intolerable pain compared with non-nulliparous patients (26.67% vs. 11.76%, P value = 0.003). Moreover, severe or intolerable pain was reported more frequently in patients with cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min (39.58% vs. 15.05%, P value = 0.0001 and 25.22% vs. 15.11%, P value = 0.044 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min were strongly associated with severe or intolerable pain (8–10 pain score).
Conclusion: Nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min seem to be the main factors associated with severe or intolerable pain during office hysteroscopy. |
topic |
Pain Office hysteroscopy Predictive factors |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569014000855 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shereefmzayed factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy AT khaledaelsetohy factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy AT mohamedzayed factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy AT usamamfouda factorsaffectingpainexperiencedduringofficehysteroscopy |
_version_ |
1725020497097261056 |