Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy

Climate change mitigation effort is being translated into several actions and discourses that make collateral benefits and their rationale increasingly relevant for sustainability, in such a way that they are now a constant part of the political agenda. Taking a border and consensual perspective, c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira, May Thorseth
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library 2016-10-01
Series:Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1942
id doaj-0206f881b8ed41a886f72869c2b049c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0206f881b8ed41a886f72869c2b049c82020-11-25T02:45:36ZdanNorwegian University of Science and Technology LibraryEtikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics1890-39911890-40092016-10-0110210.5324/eip.v10i2.19421772Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategyRita Vasconcellos Oliveira0May ThorsethNTNU Climate change mitigation effort is being translated into several actions and discourses that make collateral benefits and their rationale increasingly relevant for sustainability, in such a way that they are now a constant part of the political agenda. Taking a border and consensual perspective, co-benefits are considered here to be emerging advantages of the implementation of measures regarding the lowering of greenhouse gases. Departing from the analysis of policy documents referring to two European urban transportation strategies, the emergent co-benefits are problematized and discussed to better understand their moral aspect. Further ethical reflection is conducted after an analysis of some unintended consequences of co-benefits rationale coming from the mentioned examples. The focus is primarily on the challenges of an integrative moral justification for co-benefits and also for their role in the climate change mitigation effort. We also discuss the limitations of the current normative models that frame co-benefits rationale, from a moral viewpoint and in relation to the overall climate change mitigation strategy. In this article, we propose the concepts of well-being and freedom, as portrayed by Capabilities Approach, as possible guiding notions for the moral and social evaluation of goodness of these emergent benefits and their rationale too. Additionally, some preliminary conclusions are drawn regarding the potential of the presented concepts to favour the climate change mitigation action. Finally, a scenario is drawn where Capabilities Approach is the moral guideline for co-benefits rationale showing this way its potential in terms of enhancing climate change mitigation strategy. https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1942Co-benefitsClimate ChangeCapabilities ApproachFreedomWell-being
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira
May Thorseth
spellingShingle Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira
May Thorseth
Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
Co-benefits
Climate Change
Capabilities Approach
Freedom
Well-being
author_facet Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira
May Thorseth
author_sort Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira
title Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
title_short Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
title_full Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
title_fullStr Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
title_full_unstemmed Ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
title_sort ethical implications of co-benefits rationale within climate change mitigation strategy
publisher Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library
series Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
issn 1890-3991
1890-4009
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Climate change mitigation effort is being translated into several actions and discourses that make collateral benefits and their rationale increasingly relevant for sustainability, in such a way that they are now a constant part of the political agenda. Taking a border and consensual perspective, co-benefits are considered here to be emerging advantages of the implementation of measures regarding the lowering of greenhouse gases. Departing from the analysis of policy documents referring to two European urban transportation strategies, the emergent co-benefits are problematized and discussed to better understand their moral aspect. Further ethical reflection is conducted after an analysis of some unintended consequences of co-benefits rationale coming from the mentioned examples. The focus is primarily on the challenges of an integrative moral justification for co-benefits and also for their role in the climate change mitigation effort. We also discuss the limitations of the current normative models that frame co-benefits rationale, from a moral viewpoint and in relation to the overall climate change mitigation strategy. In this article, we propose the concepts of well-being and freedom, as portrayed by Capabilities Approach, as possible guiding notions for the moral and social evaluation of goodness of these emergent benefits and their rationale too. Additionally, some preliminary conclusions are drawn regarding the potential of the presented concepts to favour the climate change mitigation action. Finally, a scenario is drawn where Capabilities Approach is the moral guideline for co-benefits rationale showing this way its potential in terms of enhancing climate change mitigation strategy.
topic Co-benefits
Climate Change
Capabilities Approach
Freedom
Well-being
url https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/1942
work_keys_str_mv AT ritavasconcellosoliveira ethicalimplicationsofcobenefitsrationalewithinclimatechangemitigationstrategy
AT maythorseth ethicalimplicationsofcobenefitsrationalewithinclimatechangemitigationstrategy
_version_ 1724761609175302144