Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana

Abstract Like most invasive species, cane toads have attracted less research in their native range than in invaded areas. We radio-tracked 34 free-ranging toads in French Guiana, a source region for most invasive populations, across two coastal and two rainforest sites. Coastal toads generally shelt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jayna L. DeVore, Richard Shine, Simon Ducatez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91262-8
id doaj-020444ab67774656bfdbf6b106584ce2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-020444ab67774656bfdbf6b106584ce22021-06-06T11:35:41ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111510.1038/s41598-021-91262-8Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French GuianaJayna L. DeVore0Richard Shine1Simon Ducatez2School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of SydneySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of SydneySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of SydneyAbstract Like most invasive species, cane toads have attracted less research in their native range than in invaded areas. We radio-tracked 34 free-ranging toads in French Guiana, a source region for most invasive populations, across two coastal and two rainforest sites. Coastal toads generally sheltered in pools of fresh or brackish water but nocturnally foraged on beaches, whereas rainforest toads sheltered in forested habitats, moving into open areas at night. Over five days of monitoring, native toads frequently re-used shelters and moved little between days (means = 10–63 m/site) compared to invasion-front toads from Australia (~ 250 m). Larger toads moved less between days, but displaced in more consistent directions. At night, foraging toads travelled up to 200 m before returning to shelters. Foraging distance was related to body condition at coastal sites, with toads in poorer body condition travelling farther. Rain increased the probability of coastal toads sheltering in the dry habitats where they foraged. Dispersal and rainfall were lower at coastal sites, and the strategies utilized by coastal toads to minimize water loss resembled those of invasive toads in semi-desert habitats. This global invader already exhibits a broad environmental niche and substantial behavioural flexibility within its native range.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91262-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jayna L. DeVore
Richard Shine
Simon Ducatez
spellingShingle Jayna L. DeVore
Richard Shine
Simon Ducatez
Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
Scientific Reports
author_facet Jayna L. DeVore
Richard Shine
Simon Ducatez
author_sort Jayna L. DeVore
title Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
title_short Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
title_full Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
title_fullStr Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
title_full_unstemmed Spatial ecology of cane toads (Rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from French Guiana
title_sort spatial ecology of cane toads (rhinella marina) in their native range: a radiotelemetric study from french guiana
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Like most invasive species, cane toads have attracted less research in their native range than in invaded areas. We radio-tracked 34 free-ranging toads in French Guiana, a source region for most invasive populations, across two coastal and two rainforest sites. Coastal toads generally sheltered in pools of fresh or brackish water but nocturnally foraged on beaches, whereas rainforest toads sheltered in forested habitats, moving into open areas at night. Over five days of monitoring, native toads frequently re-used shelters and moved little between days (means = 10–63 m/site) compared to invasion-front toads from Australia (~ 250 m). Larger toads moved less between days, but displaced in more consistent directions. At night, foraging toads travelled up to 200 m before returning to shelters. Foraging distance was related to body condition at coastal sites, with toads in poorer body condition travelling farther. Rain increased the probability of coastal toads sheltering in the dry habitats where they foraged. Dispersal and rainfall were lower at coastal sites, and the strategies utilized by coastal toads to minimize water loss resembled those of invasive toads in semi-desert habitats. This global invader already exhibits a broad environmental niche and substantial behavioural flexibility within its native range.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91262-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jaynaldevore spatialecologyofcanetoadsrhinellamarinaintheirnativerangearadiotelemetricstudyfromfrenchguiana
AT richardshine spatialecologyofcanetoadsrhinellamarinaintheirnativerangearadiotelemetricstudyfromfrenchguiana
AT simonducatez spatialecologyofcanetoadsrhinellamarinaintheirnativerangearadiotelemetricstudyfromfrenchguiana
_version_ 1721393796513529856