Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
Evidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475 |
id |
doaj-0201456a5fb74e5dabbf5cbef7ad8b92 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0201456a5fb74e5dabbf5cbef7ad8b922021-05-29T04:31:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025147510.1371/journal.pone.0251475Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.Eloisa ValenzaGiulia CalignanoEvidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented two objects (2 faces and their phase-scrambled equivalent) and cued a location in one of the two objects. Then, a target appeared at the same location as the cue (Valid condition), or at a different location within the same object (Same Object condition), or at a different location in another object (Different Object condition). The attentional benefit/cost in terms of time for target detection in each of the three conditions was computed. The findings revealed that target detection was always faster in the valid condition than in the invalid condition, regardless of the type of stimulus and the group of children. Thus, no difference emerged between the two groups in terms of space-based attention. Conversely the two groups differed in object-based attention. Children without a diagnosis of ASD showed attentional shift cost with phase-scrambled stimuli, but not with faces. Instead, children with a diagnosis of ASD deployed similar attentional strategies to focus on faces and their phase-scrambled version.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eloisa Valenza Giulia Calignano |
spellingShingle |
Eloisa Valenza Giulia Calignano Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Eloisa Valenza Giulia Calignano |
author_sort |
Eloisa Valenza |
title |
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
title_short |
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
title_full |
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
title_fullStr |
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
title_sort |
attentional shift within and between faces: evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Evidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented two objects (2 faces and their phase-scrambled equivalent) and cued a location in one of the two objects. Then, a target appeared at the same location as the cue (Valid condition), or at a different location within the same object (Same Object condition), or at a different location in another object (Different Object condition). The attentional benefit/cost in terms of time for target detection in each of the three conditions was computed. The findings revealed that target detection was always faster in the valid condition than in the invalid condition, regardless of the type of stimulus and the group of children. Thus, no difference emerged between the two groups in terms of space-based attention. Conversely the two groups differed in object-based attention. Children without a diagnosis of ASD showed attentional shift cost with phase-scrambled stimuli, but not with faces. Instead, children with a diagnosis of ASD deployed similar attentional strategies to focus on faces and their phase-scrambled version. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eloisavalenza attentionalshiftwithinandbetweenfacesevidencefromchildrenwithandwithoutadiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder AT giuliacalignano attentionalshiftwithinandbetweenfacesevidencefromchildrenwithandwithoutadiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder |
_version_ |
1721422634733797376 |