Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.

Evidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eloisa Valenza, Giulia Calignano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475
id doaj-0201456a5fb74e5dabbf5cbef7ad8b92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0201456a5fb74e5dabbf5cbef7ad8b922021-05-29T04:31:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025147510.1371/journal.pone.0251475Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.Eloisa ValenzaGiulia CalignanoEvidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented two objects (2 faces and their phase-scrambled equivalent) and cued a location in one of the two objects. Then, a target appeared at the same location as the cue (Valid condition), or at a different location within the same object (Same Object condition), or at a different location in another object (Different Object condition). The attentional benefit/cost in terms of time for target detection in each of the three conditions was computed. The findings revealed that target detection was always faster in the valid condition than in the invalid condition, regardless of the type of stimulus and the group of children. Thus, no difference emerged between the two groups in terms of space-based attention. Conversely the two groups differed in object-based attention. Children without a diagnosis of ASD showed attentional shift cost with phase-scrambled stimuli, but not with faces. Instead, children with a diagnosis of ASD deployed similar attentional strategies to focus on faces and their phase-scrambled version.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eloisa Valenza
Giulia Calignano
spellingShingle Eloisa Valenza
Giulia Calignano
Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eloisa Valenza
Giulia Calignano
author_sort Eloisa Valenza
title Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
title_short Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
title_full Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
title_fullStr Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
title_full_unstemmed Attentional shift within and between faces: Evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
title_sort attentional shift within and between faces: evidence from children with and without a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Evidence of attentional atypicalities for faces in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are far from being confirmed. Using eye-tracking technology we compared space-based and object-based attention in children with, and without, a diagnosis of ASD. By capitalizing on Egly's paradigm, we presented two objects (2 faces and their phase-scrambled equivalent) and cued a location in one of the two objects. Then, a target appeared at the same location as the cue (Valid condition), or at a different location within the same object (Same Object condition), or at a different location in another object (Different Object condition). The attentional benefit/cost in terms of time for target detection in each of the three conditions was computed. The findings revealed that target detection was always faster in the valid condition than in the invalid condition, regardless of the type of stimulus and the group of children. Thus, no difference emerged between the two groups in terms of space-based attention. Conversely the two groups differed in object-based attention. Children without a diagnosis of ASD showed attentional shift cost with phase-scrambled stimuli, but not with faces. Instead, children with a diagnosis of ASD deployed similar attentional strategies to focus on faces and their phase-scrambled version.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251475
work_keys_str_mv AT eloisavalenza attentionalshiftwithinandbetweenfacesevidencefromchildrenwithandwithoutadiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
AT giuliacalignano attentionalshiftwithinandbetweenfacesevidencefromchildrenwithandwithoutadiagnosisofautismspectrumdisorder
_version_ 1721422634733797376