Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
In this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group. Part...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2014-07-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1 |
id |
doaj-01f24727a0ae449cac942c08e1d56a6e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-01f24727a0ae449cac942c08e1d56a6e2020-11-25T03:49:51ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022014-07-01310.12688/f1000research.2026.12229Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]Ian F. Burgess0Christine M. Brown1Pat Nair2Medical Entomology Centre, Insect Research & Development Limited, Cambridge, CB25 9AU, UKMedical Entomology Centre, Insect Research & Development Limited, Cambridge, CB25 9AU, UKConsultant in Communicable Disease Control, Bedfordshire Health Authority and Bedfordshire Family Health Authority, Luton, LU1 3AN, UKIn this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group. Participants using insecticide were treated with either the investigative 0.5% phenothrin mousse, for 30 minutes, or 0.2% phenothrin lotion, for 2 hours as the reference product. Both treatments were applied only once, followed by shampoo washing. Those treated by wet-combing with conditioner were combed 4 times over 12 days. Parents/carers carried out the treatments to mimic normal consumer use. The outcome measure was the absence of lice, 14 days after treatment for the insecticides, and up to 14 days after completion of combing. Intention to treat analysis of the outcomes for 275 participants showed success for phenothrin mousse in 21/105 (20.0%), in 23/107 (21.5%) for phenothrin lotion, and in 12/63 (19.1%) for wet-combing. People receiving mousse were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.81) times more likely to still have lice after treatment compared with those treated with lotion. The group of participants who received the wet combing treatment were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.11) times more likely to still have lice after the treatment. None of the treatments was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than any other. This study was carried out in an area where moderate resistance to phenothrin was demonstrated after the study by using a bioassay. Analysis of post treatment assessments found that failure of insecticides to kill louse eggs had influenced the outcome.http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1Hair DiseasesOccupational & Environmental MedicineParasitologySocial & Behavioral Determinants of Health |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ian F. Burgess Christine M. Brown Pat Nair |
spellingShingle |
Ian F. Burgess Christine M. Brown Pat Nair Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] F1000Research Hair Diseases Occupational & Environmental Medicine Parasitology Social & Behavioral Determinants of Health |
author_facet |
Ian F. Burgess Christine M. Brown Pat Nair |
author_sort |
Ian F. Burgess |
title |
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
title_short |
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
title_full |
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
title_sort |
comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the uk: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px] |
publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
series |
F1000Research |
issn |
2046-1402 |
publishDate |
2014-07-01 |
description |
In this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group. Participants using insecticide were treated with either the investigative 0.5% phenothrin mousse, for 30 minutes, or 0.2% phenothrin lotion, for 2 hours as the reference product. Both treatments were applied only once, followed by shampoo washing. Those treated by wet-combing with conditioner were combed 4 times over 12 days. Parents/carers carried out the treatments to mimic normal consumer use. The outcome measure was the absence of lice, 14 days after treatment for the insecticides, and up to 14 days after completion of combing. Intention to treat analysis of the outcomes for 275 participants showed success for phenothrin mousse in 21/105 (20.0%), in 23/107 (21.5%) for phenothrin lotion, and in 12/63 (19.1%) for wet-combing. People receiving mousse were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.81) times more likely to still have lice after treatment compared with those treated with lotion. The group of participants who received the wet combing treatment were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.11) times more likely to still have lice after the treatment. None of the treatments was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than any other. This study was carried out in an area where moderate resistance to phenothrin was demonstrated after the study by using a bioassay. Analysis of post treatment assessments found that failure of insecticides to kill louse eggs had influenced the outcome. |
topic |
Hair Diseases Occupational & Environmental Medicine Parasitology Social & Behavioral Determinants of Health |
url |
http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ianfburgess comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px AT christinembrown comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px AT patnair comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px |
_version_ |
1724493785584369664 |