Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]

In this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group.  Part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian F. Burgess, Christine M. Brown, Pat Nair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2014-07-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1
id doaj-01f24727a0ae449cac942c08e1d56a6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01f24727a0ae449cac942c08e1d56a6e2020-11-25T03:49:51ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022014-07-01310.12688/f1000research.2026.12229Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]Ian F. Burgess0Christine M. Brown1Pat Nair2Medical Entomology Centre, Insect Research & Development Limited, Cambridge, CB25 9AU, UKMedical Entomology Centre, Insect Research & Development Limited, Cambridge, CB25 9AU, UKConsultant in Communicable Disease Control, Bedfordshire Health Authority and Bedfordshire Family Health Authority, Luton, LU1 3AN, UKIn this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group.  Participants using insecticide were treated with either the investigative 0.5% phenothrin mousse, for 30 minutes, or 0.2% phenothrin lotion, for 2 hours as the reference product.  Both treatments were applied only once, followed by shampoo washing.  Those treated by wet-combing with conditioner were combed 4 times over 12 days.  Parents/carers carried out the treatments to mimic normal consumer use.  The outcome measure was the absence of lice, 14 days after treatment for the insecticides, and up to 14 days after completion of combing.  Intention to treat analysis of the outcomes for 275 participants showed success for phenothrin mousse in 21/105 (20.0%), in 23/107 (21.5%) for phenothrin lotion, and in 12/63 (19.1%) for wet-combing.  People receiving mousse were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.81) times more likely to still have lice after treatment compared with those treated with lotion. The group of participants who received the wet combing treatment were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.11) times more likely to still have lice after the treatment.  None of the treatments was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than any other. This study was carried out in an area where moderate resistance to phenothrin was demonstrated after the study by using a bioassay.  Analysis of post treatment assessments found that failure of insecticides to kill louse eggs had influenced the outcome.http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1Hair DiseasesOccupational & Environmental MedicineParasitologySocial & Behavioral Determinants of Health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ian F. Burgess
Christine M. Brown
Pat Nair
spellingShingle Ian F. Burgess
Christine M. Brown
Pat Nair
Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
F1000Research
Hair Diseases
Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Parasitology
Social & Behavioral Determinants of Health
author_facet Ian F. Burgess
Christine M. Brown
Pat Nair
author_sort Ian F. Burgess
title Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
title_short Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
title_full Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
title_fullStr Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the UK: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
title_sort comparison of phenothrin mousse, phenothrin lotion, and wet-combing for treatment of head louse infestation in the uk: a pragmatic randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/1px]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2014-07-01
description In this investigation of effectiveness of an alternative pediculicide dosage form, we recruited 228 children and 50 adult participants from Bedfordshire, UK, to a randomised, controlled, assessor blind trial comparing two insecticide products with mechanical removal of lice as a control group.  Participants using insecticide were treated with either the investigative 0.5% phenothrin mousse, for 30 minutes, or 0.2% phenothrin lotion, for 2 hours as the reference product.  Both treatments were applied only once, followed by shampoo washing.  Those treated by wet-combing with conditioner were combed 4 times over 12 days.  Parents/carers carried out the treatments to mimic normal consumer use.  The outcome measure was the absence of lice, 14 days after treatment for the insecticides, and up to 14 days after completion of combing.  Intention to treat analysis of the outcomes for 275 participants showed success for phenothrin mousse in 21/105 (20.0%), in 23/107 (21.5%) for phenothrin lotion, and in 12/63 (19.1%) for wet-combing.  People receiving mousse were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.81) times more likely to still have lice after treatment compared with those treated with lotion. The group of participants who received the wet combing treatment were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.11) times more likely to still have lice after the treatment.  None of the treatments was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than any other. This study was carried out in an area where moderate resistance to phenothrin was demonstrated after the study by using a bioassay.  Analysis of post treatment assessments found that failure of insecticides to kill louse eggs had influenced the outcome.
topic Hair Diseases
Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Parasitology
Social & Behavioral Determinants of Health
url http://f1000research.com/articles/3-158/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT ianfburgess comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px
AT christinembrown comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px
AT patnair comparisonofphenothrinmoussephenothrinlotionandwetcombingfortreatmentofheadlouseinfestationintheukapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledassessorblindtrialv1refstatusindexedhttpf1000res1px
_version_ 1724493785584369664