In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?

PICO question In dogs with congestive heart failure, does the use of torasemide as a first line diuretic result in a superior survival time when compared to furosemide?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leo Packham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RCVS Knowledge 2020-11-01
Series:Veterinary Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/300
id doaj-01e7ccd3dff14a9e8c32309c7dcfd16c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01e7ccd3dff14a9e8c32309c7dcfd16c2021-01-07T15:27:38ZengRCVS KnowledgeVeterinary Evidence2396-97762020-11-015410.18849/ve.v5i4.300300In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?Leo PackhamPICO question In dogs with congestive heart failure, does the use of torasemide as a first line diuretic result in a superior survival time when compared to furosemide?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Five studies were critically appraised, they were all prospective randomised controlled trials Strength of evidence Moderate Outcomes reported There is currently a lack of studies looking at comparing furosemide directly with torasemide in patients with congestive heart failure. There are many similarly drawn conclusions from the studies: torasemide is not inferior to furosemide in the treatment of CHF, torasemide is comparable to furosemide at one tenth the dose (or less) and that torasemide may be more effective at diuresis than furosemide with a prolonged duration of action Conclusion There is currently no clear and obvious benefit for the use of torasemide, over furosemide, as a first line diuretic for dogs with congestive heart failure   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/300congestive heart failurecardiovascular diseasediureticstorasemidefurosemide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leo Packham
spellingShingle Leo Packham
In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
Veterinary Evidence
congestive heart failure
cardiovascular disease
diuretics
torasemide
furosemide
author_facet Leo Packham
author_sort Leo Packham
title In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
title_short In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
title_full In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
title_fullStr In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
title_full_unstemmed In dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
title_sort in dogs with congestive heart failure, is torasemide superior to furosemide as a first line diuretic treatment?
publisher RCVS Knowledge
series Veterinary Evidence
issn 2396-9776
publishDate 2020-11-01
description PICO question In dogs with congestive heart failure, does the use of torasemide as a first line diuretic result in a superior survival time when compared to furosemide?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Five studies were critically appraised, they were all prospective randomised controlled trials Strength of evidence Moderate Outcomes reported There is currently a lack of studies looking at comparing furosemide directly with torasemide in patients with congestive heart failure. There are many similarly drawn conclusions from the studies: torasemide is not inferior to furosemide in the treatment of CHF, torasemide is comparable to furosemide at one tenth the dose (or less) and that torasemide may be more effective at diuresis than furosemide with a prolonged duration of action Conclusion There is currently no clear and obvious benefit for the use of torasemide, over furosemide, as a first line diuretic for dogs with congestive heart failure   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision-making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
topic congestive heart failure
cardiovascular disease
diuretics
torasemide
furosemide
url https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/300
work_keys_str_mv AT leopackham indogswithcongestiveheartfailureistorasemidesuperiortofurosemideasafirstlinediuretictreatment
_version_ 1724346021399494656