Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.

Fossil sites from Brazil have yielded specimens of spinosaurid theropods, among which the most informative include the cranial remains of Irritator, Angaturama, and Oxalaia. In this work some of their craniodental features are reinterpreted, providing new data for taxonomic and evolutionary issues c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcos A F Sales, Cesar L Schultz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673194?pdf=render
id doaj-01bf63a4252046a2a9b105c868eba43f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01bf63a4252046a2a9b105c868eba43f2020-11-25T01:20:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011211e018707010.1371/journal.pone.0187070Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.Marcos A F SalesCesar L SchultzFossil sites from Brazil have yielded specimens of spinosaurid theropods, among which the most informative include the cranial remains of Irritator, Angaturama, and Oxalaia. In this work some of their craniodental features are reinterpreted, providing new data for taxonomic and evolutionary issues concerning this particular clade of dinosaurs. The mesial-most tooth of the left maxilla of the holotype of Irritator is regarded as representing the third tooth position, which is also preserved in the holotype of Angaturama. Thus, both specimens cannot belong to the same individual, contrary to previous assumptions, although they could have been the same taxon. In addition, the position of the external nares of Irritator is more comparable to those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus instead of other spinosaurine spinosaurids. In fact, with regards to some craniodental features, Brazilian taxa represent intermediate conditions between Baryonychinae and Spinosaurinae. Such a scenario is corroborated by our cladistic results, which also leave open the possibility of the former subfamily being non-monophyletic. Furthermore, the differences between spinosaurids regarding the position and size of the external nares might be related to distinct feeding habits and degrees of reliance on olfaction. Other issues concerning the evolution and taxonomy of Spinosauridae require descriptions of additional material for their clarification.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673194?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcos A F Sales
Cesar L Schultz
spellingShingle Marcos A F Sales
Cesar L Schultz
Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Marcos A F Sales
Cesar L Schultz
author_sort Marcos A F Sales
title Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
title_short Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
title_full Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
title_fullStr Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
title_full_unstemmed Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil.
title_sort spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: evidence from brazil.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Fossil sites from Brazil have yielded specimens of spinosaurid theropods, among which the most informative include the cranial remains of Irritator, Angaturama, and Oxalaia. In this work some of their craniodental features are reinterpreted, providing new data for taxonomic and evolutionary issues concerning this particular clade of dinosaurs. The mesial-most tooth of the left maxilla of the holotype of Irritator is regarded as representing the third tooth position, which is also preserved in the holotype of Angaturama. Thus, both specimens cannot belong to the same individual, contrary to previous assumptions, although they could have been the same taxon. In addition, the position of the external nares of Irritator is more comparable to those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus instead of other spinosaurine spinosaurids. In fact, with regards to some craniodental features, Brazilian taxa represent intermediate conditions between Baryonychinae and Spinosaurinae. Such a scenario is corroborated by our cladistic results, which also leave open the possibility of the former subfamily being non-monophyletic. Furthermore, the differences between spinosaurids regarding the position and size of the external nares might be related to distinct feeding habits and degrees of reliance on olfaction. Other issues concerning the evolution and taxonomy of Spinosauridae require descriptions of additional material for their clarification.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673194?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosafsales spinosaurtaxonomyandevolutionofcraniodentalfeaturesevidencefrombrazil
AT cesarlschultz spinosaurtaxonomyandevolutionofcraniodentalfeaturesevidencefrombrazil
_version_ 1725135227695661056