ПОЕТИЧНЕ БАЧЕННЯ ТЕКСТУ: ДОКАЗОВІ БАЗИ ТИПОЛОГІЧНОГО ПОРІВНЯННЯ ПРОЗИ Б. ШУЛЬЦА Й ПОЕЗІЇ Б.І. АНТОНИЧА / The poetic text vision: evidentiary basis of typological comparison of B. Schulz's prose and B.I. Antonych's poetry

• Main Author: Скрипник Ірина
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bukovinian State Medical university 2015-12-01
• Series: Aktualʹnì Pitannâ Suspìlʹnih Nauk ta Istorìï Medicini
• Subjects: литературная диффузия; метажанр; «поэтика невыразимого»; дискурс; миф; literary diffusion; meta-genre; "poetic manner of unutterable”; discourse; myth
• Online Access: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=YnNtdS5lZHUudWF8YXBzbmltfGd4OjI4NDgxYWRhNDhkMzQyNjU
• ISSN: 2311-9896; 2411-6181

Скрипник Ирина. Поэтическое видение текста: доказательные базы типологического сравнения прозы Б. Шульца и поэзии Б. И. Антонича Статья является пропедевтическим шагом к широкому исследованию произведений авторов и может служить моделью для других подобных исследований, в ходе которых возникают проблемные вопросы видородовой несопоставимости. В студии главной задачей стоит объяснение целесообразности типологического анализа прозы и поэзии указанных авторов. Тексты писателей вливаются в течение общеевропейского контекста (где нас больше интересует его украинский и польский варианты) "выражение неописуемого", что мы можем считать своеобразной первой доказательной базой сравнительного исследования данной темы. Второй доказательной базой, что позволяет нам осуществлять компаративный анализ лирических и эпических произведений, является значительное наличие в текстах обоих писателей такого литературного явления как литературная диффузия. Ключевые слова: литературная диффузия, метажанр, «поэтика невыразимого», дискурс, миф. Skrypnyk Iryna. The poetic text vision: evidentiary basis of typological comparison of B. Schulz's prose and B.I. Antonych's poetry. The article is a propaedeutic step to a wide long term authors' works research and can serve as a model for other similar studying, during which the issues of irrelation of kind and genre might occur. At the while studing the main objective is to explain the typological analysis of prose and poetry of these authors feasibility. After determining that the dominant in the analysis is the discourse of myth as a common reasoning of all works of both artists; and, based on the characteristics of the interwar two decades - a period when both Schulz and Antonych are the most active in their work, we conclude that the authors' texts fall into the mainstream of common European context (out of which we are mostly interested in Ukrainian and Polish aspects) of the "expression of unutterable" that we consider the first evidence base of the subject comparative study. This concept stands first evidence base opportunities typological comparison of prose and poetry writers. The essence of the poetics of unutterable/ unspeakable lies in an attempt with the help of language and its expressive possibilities to sink in the ancient origins that in fact is the myth as a thought form and to define those things and concepts that are beyond human understanding, in subconsciousness. The second evidence base that allows us to compare lyric and epic works, is a significant presence of a literary diffusion phenomenon in the texts of both writers . Yet, all studies in this field have drawn attention to the genre diffusion within a literary kind until now. However, according to the specificity of B.I Antonych and B. Schultz works we are interested in class diffusion, which somewhat complicates finding a theoretical framework. Following the same way as the genre diffusion researchers, we turned to science and found interesting sub -kind of diffusion - ambipolar diffusion - simultaneous diffusion of opposite charged particles in the quasineutral environment. Therefore, ambipolar diffusion of the artistic work is the process of combining the features and the characteristics of two or more literary classes that are in the field of influence of one discourse or metagenre (with the condition of its broad interpretation as a "dominant" genre of certain age, period) in a single text. Key words: literary diffusion, meta-genre, "poetic manner of unutterable”, discourse, myth.