Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.

BACKGROUND: Stress has been suggested to play a role in the development and perpetuation of functional somatic syndromes. The mechanisms of how this might occur are not clear. PURPOSE: We propose a multi-dimensional stress model which posits that childhood trauma increases adult stress reactivity (i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne Fischer, Gunnar Lemmer, Mario Gollwitzer, Urs M Nater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4232257?pdf=render
id doaj-01b32114240a4cfb80c03469386de414
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01b32114240a4cfb80c03469386de4142020-11-25T01:53:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11121410.1371/journal.pone.0111214Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.Susanne FischerGunnar LemmerMario GollwitzerUrs M NaterBACKGROUND: Stress has been suggested to play a role in the development and perpetuation of functional somatic syndromes. The mechanisms of how this might occur are not clear. PURPOSE: We propose a multi-dimensional stress model which posits that childhood trauma increases adult stress reactivity (i.e., an individual's tendency to respond strongly to stressors) and reduces resilience (e.g., the belief in one's competence). This in turn facilitates the manifestation of functional somatic syndromes via chronic stress. We tested this model cross-sectionally and prospectively. METHODS: Young adults participated in a web survey at two time points. Structural equation modeling was used to test our model. The final sample consisted of 3'054 participants, and 429 of these participated in the follow-up survey. RESULTS: Our proposed model fit the data in the cross-sectional (χ2(21)  = 48.808, p<.001, CFI  = .995, TLI  = .992, RMSEA  = .021, 90% CI [.013.029]) and prospective analyses (χ2(21)  =  32.675, p<.05, CFI  = .982, TLI  = .969, RMSEA  = .036, 90% CI [.001.059]). DISCUSSION: Our findings have several clinical implications, suggesting a role for stress management training in the prevention and treatment of functional somatic syndromes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4232257?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susanne Fischer
Gunnar Lemmer
Mario Gollwitzer
Urs M Nater
spellingShingle Susanne Fischer
Gunnar Lemmer
Mario Gollwitzer
Urs M Nater
Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Susanne Fischer
Gunnar Lemmer
Mario Gollwitzer
Urs M Nater
author_sort Susanne Fischer
title Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
title_short Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
title_full Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
title_fullStr Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
title_full_unstemmed Stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
title_sort stress and resilience in functional somatic syndromes--a structural equation modeling approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Stress has been suggested to play a role in the development and perpetuation of functional somatic syndromes. The mechanisms of how this might occur are not clear. PURPOSE: We propose a multi-dimensional stress model which posits that childhood trauma increases adult stress reactivity (i.e., an individual's tendency to respond strongly to stressors) and reduces resilience (e.g., the belief in one's competence). This in turn facilitates the manifestation of functional somatic syndromes via chronic stress. We tested this model cross-sectionally and prospectively. METHODS: Young adults participated in a web survey at two time points. Structural equation modeling was used to test our model. The final sample consisted of 3'054 participants, and 429 of these participated in the follow-up survey. RESULTS: Our proposed model fit the data in the cross-sectional (χ2(21)  = 48.808, p<.001, CFI  = .995, TLI  = .992, RMSEA  = .021, 90% CI [.013.029]) and prospective analyses (χ2(21)  =  32.675, p<.05, CFI  = .982, TLI  = .969, RMSEA  = .036, 90% CI [.001.059]). DISCUSSION: Our findings have several clinical implications, suggesting a role for stress management training in the prevention and treatment of functional somatic syndromes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4232257?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT susannefischer stressandresilienceinfunctionalsomaticsyndromesastructuralequationmodelingapproach
AT gunnarlemmer stressandresilienceinfunctionalsomaticsyndromesastructuralequationmodelingapproach
AT mariogollwitzer stressandresilienceinfunctionalsomaticsyndromesastructuralequationmodelingapproach
AT ursmnater stressandresilienceinfunctionalsomaticsyndromesastructuralequationmodelingapproach
_version_ 1724990780683059200