Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?

One way to approach the question of whether there are non-derivative partial reasons of any kind is to give an account of what partial reasons are, and then to consider whether there are such reasons. If there are, then it is at least possible that there are partial reasons of friendship. It is this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Reisner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Montréal 2008-02-01
Series:Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.creum.umontreal.ca/IMG/pdf_volume3no1_07_reisner.pdf
id doaj-01a7a2b9aee2451287c82eb8bfde13d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01a7a2b9aee2451287c82eb8bfde13d82020-11-25T01:00:53ZengUniversité de MontréalLes Ateliers de l’Ethique1718-99772008-02-01317079Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ? Andrew ReisnerOne way to approach the question of whether there are non-derivative partial reasons of any kind is to give an account of what partial reasons are, and then to consider whether there are such reasons. If there are, then it is at least possible that there are partial reasons of friendship. It is this approach that will be taken here, and it produces several interesting results. The first is a point about the structure of partial reasons. It is at least a necessary condition of a reason’s being partial that it has an explicit relational component. This component, technically, is a relatum in the reason relation that itself is a relation between the person to whom the reason applies and the person whom the action for which there is a reason concerns. The second conclusion of the paper is that this relational component is also required for a number of types of putatively impartial reasons. In order to avoid trivialising the distinction between partial and impartial reasons, some further sufficient condition must be applied. Finally, there is some prospect for a way of distinguishing between impartial reasons that contain a relational component and partial reasons, but that this approach suggests that the question of whether ethics is partial or impartial will be settled at the level of normative ethical discourse, or at least not at the level of discourse about the nature of reasons for action.http://www.creum.umontreal.ca/IMG/pdf_volume3no1_07_reisner.pdfethicsfundamental ethicspartialityrelational
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Reisner
spellingShingle Andrew Reisner
Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
ethics
fundamental ethics
partiality
relational
author_facet Andrew Reisner
author_sort Andrew Reisner
title Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
title_short Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
title_full Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
title_fullStr Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
title_full_unstemmed Does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
title_sort does friendship give us non-derivative partial reasons ?
publisher Université de Montréal
series Les Ateliers de l’Ethique
issn 1718-9977
publishDate 2008-02-01
description One way to approach the question of whether there are non-derivative partial reasons of any kind is to give an account of what partial reasons are, and then to consider whether there are such reasons. If there are, then it is at least possible that there are partial reasons of friendship. It is this approach that will be taken here, and it produces several interesting results. The first is a point about the structure of partial reasons. It is at least a necessary condition of a reason’s being partial that it has an explicit relational component. This component, technically, is a relatum in the reason relation that itself is a relation between the person to whom the reason applies and the person whom the action for which there is a reason concerns. The second conclusion of the paper is that this relational component is also required for a number of types of putatively impartial reasons. In order to avoid trivialising the distinction between partial and impartial reasons, some further sufficient condition must be applied. Finally, there is some prospect for a way of distinguishing between impartial reasons that contain a relational component and partial reasons, but that this approach suggests that the question of whether ethics is partial or impartial will be settled at the level of normative ethical discourse, or at least not at the level of discourse about the nature of reasons for action.
topic ethics
fundamental ethics
partiality
relational
url http://www.creum.umontreal.ca/IMG/pdf_volume3no1_07_reisner.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewreisner doesfriendshipgiveusnonderivativepartialreasons
_version_ 1725212157726949376