Stereotactic aspiration versus craniotomy for primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: A wealth of evidence based on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has indicated that surgery may be a better choice in the management of primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared to conservative treatment. However, there is considerable controversy over selecting appropriate su...
Main Authors: | Jia-Wei Wang, Jin-Ping Li, Ying-Lun Song, Ke Tan, Yu Wang, Tao Li, Peng Guo, Xiong Li, Yan Wang, Qi-Huang Zhao |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4169548?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Stereotactic Catheter Drainage Versus Conventional Craniotomy for Severe Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Basal Ganglia
by: Jia Shi, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Intracerebral hemorrhage with tentorial herniation: Conventional open surgery or emergency stereotactic craniopuncture aspiration surgery?
by: Shi Jing, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Xu‐Hui Zhao, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A prospective controlled study: Minimally invasive stereotactic puncture therapy versus conventional craniotomy in the treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage
by: Tang Yuping, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Delayed Stereotactic Computed Tomographic-Guided Aspiration in The Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage:
by: Chih-Ju Chang, et al.
Published: (2003)