Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes

Abstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: François-Xavier Crahay, Guillaume Debellemanière, Stephan Tobalem, Wassim Ghazal, Sarah Moran, Damien Gatinel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3
id doaj-01a151534228496e9a738c954869c8e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01a151534228496e9a738c954869c8e22021-03-28T11:29:00ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-011111810.1038/s41598-021-86185-3Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyesFrançois-Xavier Crahay0Guillaume Debellemanière1Stephan Tobalem2Wassim Ghazal3Sarah Moran4Damien Gatinel5Rothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalAbstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps from 3227 eyes of 3227 patients (969 keratoconus and 2258 normal eyes) to calculate anterior and posterior corneal surface area. We compared results from normal eyes and keratoconus eyes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Keratoconus eyes were shown to have statistically significantly larger corneal surface areas, measured at the central 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm, and total corneal diameter. However, no significant increase in corneal surface area was seen with increasing severity of keratoconus. We suggest that these results indicate redistribution, rather than increase, of the corneal surface area with keratoconus severity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author François-Xavier Crahay
Guillaume Debellemanière
Stephan Tobalem
Wassim Ghazal
Sarah Moran
Damien Gatinel
spellingShingle François-Xavier Crahay
Guillaume Debellemanière
Stephan Tobalem
Wassim Ghazal
Sarah Moran
Damien Gatinel
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
Scientific Reports
author_facet François-Xavier Crahay
Guillaume Debellemanière
Stephan Tobalem
Wassim Ghazal
Sarah Moran
Damien Gatinel
author_sort François-Xavier Crahay
title Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
title_short Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
title_full Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
title_sort quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps from 3227 eyes of 3227 patients (969 keratoconus and 2258 normal eyes) to calculate anterior and posterior corneal surface area. We compared results from normal eyes and keratoconus eyes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Keratoconus eyes were shown to have statistically significantly larger corneal surface areas, measured at the central 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm, and total corneal diameter. However, no significant increase in corneal surface area was seen with increasing severity of keratoconus. We suggest that these results indicate redistribution, rather than increase, of the corneal surface area with keratoconus severity.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3
work_keys_str_mv AT francoisxaviercrahay quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
AT guillaumedebellemaniere quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
AT stephantobalem quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
AT wassimghazal quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
AT sarahmoran quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
AT damiengatinel quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes
_version_ 1724199925821997056