Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes
Abstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3 |
id |
doaj-01a151534228496e9a738c954869c8e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-01a151534228496e9a738c954869c8e22021-03-28T11:29:00ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-011111810.1038/s41598-021-86185-3Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyesFrançois-Xavier Crahay0Guillaume Debellemanière1Stephan Tobalem2Wassim Ghazal3Sarah Moran4Damien Gatinel5Rothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalRothschild Foundation HospitalAbstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps from 3227 eyes of 3227 patients (969 keratoconus and 2258 normal eyes) to calculate anterior and posterior corneal surface area. We compared results from normal eyes and keratoconus eyes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Keratoconus eyes were shown to have statistically significantly larger corneal surface areas, measured at the central 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm, and total corneal diameter. However, no significant increase in corneal surface area was seen with increasing severity of keratoconus. We suggest that these results indicate redistribution, rather than increase, of the corneal surface area with keratoconus severity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
François-Xavier Crahay Guillaume Debellemanière Stephan Tobalem Wassim Ghazal Sarah Moran Damien Gatinel |
spellingShingle |
François-Xavier Crahay Guillaume Debellemanière Stephan Tobalem Wassim Ghazal Sarah Moran Damien Gatinel Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
François-Xavier Crahay Guillaume Debellemanière Stephan Tobalem Wassim Ghazal Sarah Moran Damien Gatinel |
author_sort |
François-Xavier Crahay |
title |
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
title_short |
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
title_full |
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
title_fullStr |
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
title_sort |
quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Keratoconus is a highly prevalent corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning, steepening and irregular astigmatism. To date, pathophysiology of keratoconus development and progression remains debated. In this study, we retrospectively analysed topographic elevation maps from 3227 eyes of 3227 patients (969 keratoconus and 2258 normal eyes) to calculate anterior and posterior corneal surface area. We compared results from normal eyes and keratoconus eyes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich classification. Keratoconus eyes were shown to have statistically significantly larger corneal surface areas, measured at the central 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm, and total corneal diameter. However, no significant increase in corneal surface area was seen with increasing severity of keratoconus. We suggest that these results indicate redistribution, rather than increase, of the corneal surface area with keratoconus severity. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86185-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francoisxaviercrahay quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes AT guillaumedebellemaniere quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes AT stephantobalem quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes AT wassimghazal quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes AT sarahmoran quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes AT damiengatinel quantitativecomparisonofcornealsurfaceareasinkeratoconusandnormaleyes |
_version_ |
1724199925821997056 |